Vorticity dynamics and drag for flows over a sphere and a prolate spheroid

The connection between the drag and vorticity dynamics for viscous flow over a bluff body is explored using the Josephson–Anderson (J–A) relation for classical fluids. The instantaneous rate of work on the fluid, associated with the drag force, is related to the vorticity flux across the streamlines of a background potential flow. The vorticity transport itself is examined by aid of the Huggins vorticity-flux tensor. The analysis is performed for three flows: flow over a sphere at Reynolds numbers $Re=200,3700$ , and flow over a prolate spheroid at $Re=3000$ and $20^{\circ }$ incidence. In these flows, the vorticity transport shifts the flow away from and towards the ideal potential flow, with a net balance towards the former effect thus making an appreciable contribution to the drag. The J–A relation is first demonstrated for the flow over a sphere at $Re=200$ . The drag power injection is related to the viscous flux of azimuthal vorticity from the wall into the fluid, and the advection of vorticity by the detached shear layer. In the wake, the azimuthal vorticity is advected towards the wake centreline and is annihilated by viscous effects, which contributes a reduction in drag. The analysis of the flow over a sphere at $Re=3700$ is reported for the impulsively started and stationary stages, with emphasis on the effects of unsteady two-dimensional separation and turbulent transport in the transitional wake. The turbulent flux in the wake enhances the transport of mean azimuthal vorticity towards the wake centreline, and is the main driver of the recovery of enthalpy between the rear point of the sphere and far downstream. The rate of work on the fluid by the drag force for a prolate spheroid is mostly due to the transport of vorticity along the separated boundary layers. Primary and secondary separation contribute oppositely to the power injection by the drag force, while the large-scale vortices only re-distribute vorticity without a net contribution. A mechanism for secondary separation is proposed based on the theory of vortex-induced separation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.10291
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vorticity dynamics and drag for flows over a sphere and a prolate spheroid

Tamer A. Zaki, Yifan Du
3 citations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
4.00
article

Vorticity dynamics and drag for flows over a sphere and a prolate spheroid

Tamer A. Zaki, Yifan Du
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The connection between the drag and vorticity dynamics for viscous flow over a bluff body is explored using the Josephson–Anderson (J–A) relation for classical fluids. The instantaneous rate of work on the fluid, associated with the drag force, is related to the vorticity flux across the streamlines of a background potential flow. The vorticity transport itself is examined by aid of the Huggins vorticity-flux tensor. The analysis is performed for three flows: flow over a sphere at Reynolds numbers $Re=200,3700$ , and flow over a prolate spheroid at $Re=3000$ and $20^{\circ }$ incidence. In these flows, the vorticity transport shifts the flow away from and towards the ideal potential flow, with a net balance towards the former effect thus making an appreciable contribution to the drag. The J–A relation is first demonstrated for the flow over a sphere at $Re=200$ . The drag power injection is related to the viscous flux of azimuthal vorticity from the wall into the fluid, and the advection of vorticity by the detached shear layer. In the wake, the azimuthal vorticity is advected towards the wake centreline and is annihilated by viscous effects, which contributes a reduction in drag. The analysis of the flow over a sphere at $Re=3700$ is reported for the impulsively started and stationary stages, with emphasis on the effects of unsteady two-dimensional separation and turbulent transport in the transitional wake. The turbulent flux in the wake enhances the transport of mean azimuthal vorticity towards the wake centreline, and is the main driver of the recovery of enthalpy between the rear point of the sphere and far downstream. The rate of work on the fluid by the drag force for a prolate spheroid is mostly due to the transport of vorticity along the separated boundary layers. Primary and secondary separation contribute oppositely to the power injection by the drag force, while the large-scale vortices only re-distribute vorticity without a net contribution. A mechanism for secondary separation is proposed based on the theory of vortex-induced separation.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1015
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Maryland Advanced Research Computing Center, University of Cambridge, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.