Private praise

Abstract A basic assumption in the literature about praise and blame is that one cannot privately praise. Strangely this has not been argued for. It’s obvious that I can praise you without anyone other than the two of us knowing. But can I praise you without you knowing? The skeptic would say no. Why not? For one, we characterize praise as being overtly expressed. For another, it awkwardly fits our language. We rarely speak of private praise under that description. Further, the skeptic may deny that apparent examples are praise at all, subsuming them under a nearby notions such as admiration. In this paper, I offer a variety of examples to motivate the idea that private praise is a familiar and important phenomenon. I argue that none of the skeptic’s actual considerations hold up under scrutiny. On behalf of the skeptic, I develop a more promising argument against the possibility of private praise: that praise is a success term. I suggest that this argument is still implausible, though I leave it open for a skeptic to develop. Recognizing private praise as something that can and does happen has implications for debates about praise and blame. More importantly, it illuminates an aspect of one’s inner world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Studies
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-025-02375-z
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Private praise

Timothy M. Kwiatek
Philosophical Studies
Free Will and Agency
article

Private praise

Timothy M. Kwiatek
article en

Abstract

Abstract A basic assumption in the literature about praise and blame is that one cannot privately praise. Strangely this has not been argued for. It’s obvious that I can praise you without anyone other than the two of us knowing. But can I praise you without you knowing? The skeptic would say no. Why not? For one, we characterize praise as being overtly expressed. For another, it awkwardly fits our language. We rarely speak of private praise under that description. Further, the skeptic may deny that apparent examples are praise at all, subsuming them under a nearby notions such as admiration. In this paper, I offer a variety of examples to motivate the idea that private praise is a familiar and important phenomenon. I argue that none of the skeptic’s actual considerations hold up under scrutiny. On behalf of the skeptic, I develop a more promising argument against the possibility of private praise: that praise is a success term. I suggest that this argument is still implausible, though I leave it open for a skeptic to develop. Recognizing private praise as something that can and does happen has implications for debates about praise and blame. More importantly, it illuminates an aspect of one’s inner world.

Philosophical StudiesVol. 182(10)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Private praise — Timothy M. Kwiatek · Philosophical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS