Abuse of Authority by the Directorate General of Taxes: State Administrative Law Perspective

Abuse of authority by state officials, including Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) may potentially occur, either in the form of intentional abuse of authority or errors in the use of authority. With the authority granted by legislation, DGT performs supervisory functions that grant it the authority to conduct tax audits, expand the taxpayer base (WP), and intensify tax collection through clarification letters (SP2DK). This study analyses the forms of abuse of authority by DGT, both those involving intentional misuse of power (abuse of power) and errors in the use of authority without malicious intent and without deviating from the original purpose (misuse of authority). In the execution of its supervisory functions, DGT may commit either of these errors due to the oversight procedures that do not adequately balance the rights and obligations between DGT and taxpayers, weak oversight, and the asymmetry of tax regulation knowledge between DGT and taxpayers. This study also discusses the solutions that administrative law can offer to eliminate the abuse of authority, including implementing cooperative compliance and external supervision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DE RECHTSSTAAT
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.15497
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abuse of Authority by the Directorate General of Taxes: State Administrative Law Perspective

Agustin Widjiastuti, Dave David Tedjokusumo, Arief Satrya Budianto, Ika Fransisca
DE RECHTSSTAAT
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Abuse of Authority by the Directorate General of Taxes: State Administrative Law Perspective

Agustin Widjiastuti, Dave David Tedjokusumo, Arief Satrya Budianto, Ika Fransisca
article en

Abstract

Abuse of authority by state officials, including Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) may potentially occur, either in the form of intentional abuse of authority or errors in the use of authority. With the authority granted by legislation, DGT performs supervisory functions that grant it the authority to conduct tax audits, expand the taxpayer base (WP), and intensify tax collection through clarification letters (SP2DK). This study analyses the forms of abuse of authority by DGT, both those involving intentional misuse of power (abuse of power) and errors in the use of authority without malicious intent and without deviating from the original purpose (misuse of authority). In the execution of its supervisory functions, DGT may commit either of these errors due to the oversight procedures that do not adequately balance the rights and obligations between DGT and taxpayers, weak oversight, and the asymmetry of tax regulation knowledge between DGT and taxpayers. This study also discusses the solutions that administrative law can offer to eliminate the abuse of authority, including implementing cooperative compliance and external supervision.

DE RECHTSSTAATVol. 11(1)
Pelita Harapan University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abuse of Authority by the Directorate General of Taxes: State Administrative Law Perspective — Agustin Widjiastuti, Dave David Tedjokusumo, et al. · DE RECHTSSTAAT (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS