Testing the mechanical performance of a single taper-retained implant–abutment connection under static and dynamic loads: an in vitro study

The mechanical strength and stability of single taper-retained implant–abutment connections in dental implantations have not been determined. We evaluated the mechanical performance of a single taper-retained implant system with two specifications (M1 and M2, with locking diameters being 2.0 and 2.5 mm, respectively). Static and dynamic loading, torsional strength, and lateral load tests were performed. M1 and M2 samples showed significantly different ( P < 0.05) static destructive powers (363.3 ± 22.32 and 583.6 ± 15.7 N, respectively). The dynamic maximum bending moment of both samples was 1276 N mm. M1 and M2 samples showed a yield torque of 114.8 ± 13.9 and 114.3 ± 6.9 N cm, a maximum yield torque of 130.0 ± 12.0 and 156.5 ± 6.6 N cm ( P < 0.05), an axial pull force of 179.8 ± 19.5 and 207.4 ± 13.7 N ( P < 0.05), and a lateral force of 140.2 ± 14.7 N and 238.15 ± 14.38 N ( P < 0.05). No damage or fracture was observed in abutments or implants after testing. The single taper-retained implant–abutment connection showed high mechanical stability and durability, thus is a reliable replacement of the traditional screw-retained connection. Increasing the locking diameter of the abutment enhanced the mechanical strength of the connection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Materials
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2025.1625770
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the mechanical performance of a single taper-retained implant–abutment connection under static and dynamic loads: an in vitro study

Hongwu Wei, Ning Cao, Shui-Gen Guo, Hao Wu et al.
Frontiers in Materials
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Testing the mechanical performance of a single taper-retained implant–abutment connection under static and dynamic loads: an in vitro study

Hongwu Wei, Ning Cao, Shui-Gen Guo, Hao Wu, Lingfei Cao, Xu Zhang, Fei Yu, Shicheng Wei
article en

Abstract

The mechanical strength and stability of single taper-retained implant–abutment connections in dental implantations have not been determined. We evaluated the mechanical performance of a single taper-retained implant system with two specifications (M1 and M2, with locking diameters being 2.0 and 2.5 mm, respectively). Static and dynamic loading, torsional strength, and lateral load tests were performed. M1 and M2 samples showed significantly different ( P < 0.05) static destructive powers (363.3 ± 22.32 and 583.6 ± 15.7 N, respectively). The dynamic maximum bending moment of both samples was 1276 N mm. M1 and M2 samples showed a yield torque of 114.8 ± 13.9 and 114.3 ± 6.9 N cm, a maximum yield torque of 130.0 ± 12.0 and 156.5 ± 6.6 N cm ( P < 0.05), an axial pull force of 179.8 ± 19.5 and 207.4 ± 13.7 N ( P < 0.05), and a lateral force of 140.2 ± 14.7 N and 238.15 ± 14.38 N ( P < 0.05). No damage or fracture was observed in abutments or implants after testing. The single taper-retained implant–abutment connection showed high mechanical stability and durability, thus is a reliable replacement of the traditional screw-retained connection. Increasing the locking diameter of the abutment enhanced the mechanical strength of the connection.

Frontiers in MaterialsVol. 12
Nanchang University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.