Stakeholder Perspectives on BIM-LCA Integration in Building Design: Adoption, Challenges, and Future Directions

• While 85% of participants reported applying sustainability strategies, only 53% conduct LCA and just 29% use BIM–LCA tools. • BIM-LCA is the go-to strategy for BIM users; non-BIM users still use conventional LCA methods. • LCA is often applied at detailed design for sustainability certification with limited influence on design. • The challenges and barriers to the adoption of BIM-LCA identified are cross-referenced with recent developments in the literature. • Priorities actions for user-centred BIM-LCA development are proposed. Europe's ambitious net-zero carbon targets compel the AEC sector to adapt quickly. Mandatory whole-life carbon declarations will require stakeholders to quantify environmental impacts using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and take action to reduce them. However, LCA is widely perceived as complex, time-consuming, and costly. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has the potential to streamline LCA processes (e.g. quantity take-off). Although research on BIM–LCA integration has grown substantially since 2013, the extent of its adoption in practice remains unclear, and the perspectives of end-users have been largely overlooked. This study addresses this gap by assessing BIM-LCA adoption and end-user challenges through a mixed-method approach: a survey of 62 stakeholders and a focus group with six LCA specialists. Results show that while 85 % of participants apply sustainability strategies, only 53 % have experience with LCA, and 29 % use BIM–LCA tools. LCA is most often conducted at late design stages, primarily to comply with certification requirements. Barriers reported include the lack of comprehensive environmental databases, limited interoperability, high information requirements, repetitive manual tasks (e.g., editing the BoQ and mapping BIM and LCA data), lack an interactive process (real-time feedback), and limited support for result interpretation. Participants expressed strong interest in early-stage parametric modelling, continuous performance monitoring, real-time BIM synchronisation, and integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and multi-objective optimisation. This study goes beyond diagnosis by identifying recent developments that address these user challenges and outlining priorities for user-centred BIM–LCA development across four areas: Data & Standardisation, Automation & Digital Tools, and Decision Support methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113434
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on BIM-LCA Integration in Building Design: Adoption, Challenges, and Future Directions

Ricardo Resende, Vasco Rato, Sara Parece
6 citations
Building and Environment
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
6.04
article

Stakeholder Perspectives on BIM-LCA Integration in Building Design: Adoption, Challenges, and Future Directions

Ricardo Resende, Vasco Rato, Sara Parece
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• While 85% of participants reported applying sustainability strategies, only 53% conduct LCA and just 29% use BIM–LCA tools. • BIM-LCA is the go-to strategy for BIM users; non-BIM users still use conventional LCA methods. • LCA is often applied at detailed design for sustainability certification with limited influence on design. • The challenges and barriers to the adoption of BIM-LCA identified are cross-referenced with recent developments in the literature. • Priorities actions for user-centred BIM-LCA development are proposed. Europe's ambitious net-zero carbon targets compel the AEC sector to adapt quickly. Mandatory whole-life carbon declarations will require stakeholders to quantify environmental impacts using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and take action to reduce them. However, LCA is widely perceived as complex, time-consuming, and costly. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has the potential to streamline LCA processes (e.g. quantity take-off). Although research on BIM–LCA integration has grown substantially since 2013, the extent of its adoption in practice remains unclear, and the perspectives of end-users have been largely overlooked. This study addresses this gap by assessing BIM-LCA adoption and end-user challenges through a mixed-method approach: a survey of 62 stakeholders and a focus group with six LCA specialists. Results show that while 85 % of participants apply sustainability strategies, only 53 % have experience with LCA, and 29 % use BIM–LCA tools. LCA is most often conducted at late design stages, primarily to comply with certification requirements. Barriers reported include the lack of comprehensive environmental databases, limited interoperability, high information requirements, repetitive manual tasks (e.g., editing the BoQ and mapping BIM and LCA data), lack an interactive process (real-time feedback), and limited support for result interpretation. Participants expressed strong interest in early-stage parametric modelling, continuous performance monitoring, real-time BIM synchronisation, and integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and multi-objective optimisation. This study goes beyond diagnosis by identifying recent developments that address these user challenges and outlining priorities for user-centred BIM–LCA development across four areas: Data & Standardisation, Automation & Digital Tools, and Decision Support methods.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 284
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.