Testing the international expert recommendations on image capture for reflectance/cutaneous confocal microscopy: An international mixed methods study

International expert recommendations for reflectance confocal microscopy/cutaneous confocal microscopy (RCM/CCM) image acquisition of cutaneous tumors have been published.1 We sought to determine if the use of these recommendations produced images of adequate quality for asynchronous diagnosis and to explore acceptability of the recommendations by clinicians. For each lesion captured using the recommendations, site-readers completed a form measuring quality parameters. Technicians were invited to complete a questionnaire pre- and postuse of the recommendations, based on an acceptability framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2025.07.019
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the international expert recommendations on image capture for reflectance/cutaneous confocal microscopy: An international mixed methods study

Andrea L. Smith, Melissa Gill, Manu Jain, Linda K. Martin et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

Testing the international expert recommendations on image capture for reflectance/cutaneous confocal microscopy: An international mixed methods study

Andrea L. Smith, Melissa Gill, Manu Jain, Linda K. Martin, Cristián Navarrete‐Dechent, Jane M. Grant‐Kels, Genevieve Ho, Peter C. Friedman, Bruna Gallo, Christian Gronbeck, Joanna Łudzik, Pascale Guitera, Salvador González, Virginia Velasco‐Tamariz
article en

Abstract

International expert recommendations for reflectance confocal microscopy/cutaneous confocal microscopy (RCM/CCM) image acquisition of cutaneous tumors have been published.1 We sought to determine if the use of these recommendations produced images of adequate quality for asynchronous diagnosis and to explore acceptability of the recommendations by clinicians. For each lesion captured using the recommendations, site-readers completed a form measuring quality parameters. Technicians were invited to complete a questionnaire pre- and postuse of the recommendations, based on an acceptability framework.

Journal of the American Academy of DermatologyVol. 93(5)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Connecticut (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Oregon Health & Science University (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), Cornell University (US), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), University of Florida Health (US), University of Florida (US), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Skin Specialty Dermatology (United States) (US), Melanoma Institute Australia (AU), Spanish Head & Neck Cancer Cooperative Group (ES), UConn Health (US), Florida College (US), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Avant Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.