Media coverage of biodiversity research in the Netherlands: news triggers, sources, and frames

• Political and societal triggers account for almost half of the biodiversity news in Dutch newspapers. • Scientists are the most common sources in biodiversity research news, independent of news triggers. • Biodiversity research news focuses mostly on causes, with limited attention to effects. Addressing biodiversity loss requires both policy reforms and active public engagement. Media coverage plays a critical role in shaping societal awareness and influencing political discourse. Despite this importance, little research has examined how biodiversity is presented in the media. This study analyzes 817 Dutch newspaper articles about biodiversity research using an iterative coding process, focussing on news triggers, sources and framing. Findings indicate that nearly half of the articles were triggered by non-scientific events, such as political developments and societal debates, highlighting an opportunity for researchers to increase public engagement by linking their work to current affairs. Scientific sources were used in 82.9% of the articles, whereas societal, political, and particularly economic sources were rarely used, limiting the diversity of perspectives in biodiversity reporting. Biodiversity loss was predominantly framed through its causes − especially economic causes − while effects received limited attention. Political and economic solutions were most frequently discussed, while societal solutions were rarely mentioned. Our results imply that the current way biodiversity research is covered in newspapers might reduce the relevance to the readers. Biodiversity research communication can be more effective when broadening the diversity of sources, incorporating societal frames and ensuring a more balanced focus on causes, effects and solutions. We encourage biodiversity researchers to consider this when communicating about their work, or engaging with journalists, to enhance audience relevance and engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Nature Conservation
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127018
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Media coverage of biodiversity research in the Netherlands: news triggers, sources, and frames

Tuomas Aivelo, Nel Ruigrok, Ionica Smeets, Anna W. M. Heerdink
Journal for Nature Conservation
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Media coverage of biodiversity research in the Netherlands: news triggers, sources, and frames

Tuomas Aivelo, Nel Ruigrok, Ionica Smeets, Anna W. M. Heerdink
article en

Abstract

• Political and societal triggers account for almost half of the biodiversity news in Dutch newspapers. • Scientists are the most common sources in biodiversity research news, independent of news triggers. • Biodiversity research news focuses mostly on causes, with limited attention to effects. Addressing biodiversity loss requires both policy reforms and active public engagement. Media coverage plays a critical role in shaping societal awareness and influencing political discourse. Despite this importance, little research has examined how biodiversity is presented in the media. This study analyzes 817 Dutch newspaper articles about biodiversity research using an iterative coding process, focussing on news triggers, sources and framing. Findings indicate that nearly half of the articles were triggered by non-scientific events, such as political developments and societal debates, highlighting an opportunity for researchers to increase public engagement by linking their work to current affairs. Scientific sources were used in 82.9% of the articles, whereas societal, political, and particularly economic sources were rarely used, limiting the diversity of perspectives in biodiversity reporting. Biodiversity loss was predominantly framed through its causes − especially economic causes − while effects received limited attention. Political and economic solutions were most frequently discussed, while societal solutions were rarely mentioned. Our results imply that the current way biodiversity research is covered in newspapers might reduce the relevance to the readers. Biodiversity research communication can be more effective when broadening the diversity of sources, incorporating societal frames and ensuring a more balanced focus on causes, effects and solutions. We encourage biodiversity researchers to consider this when communicating about their work, or engaging with journalists, to enhance audience relevance and engagement.

Journal for Nature ConservationVol. 88
Leiden University (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.