Effects of dietary hybrid rye on quality and consumer eating quality of pork from pigs raised under organic conditions

Abstract Winter hybrid rye has become of interest to organic farmers in the Midwest region of the United States due to its potential for high yields, hardy overwintering, and environmental benefits. We investigated whether inclusion of hybrid rye in swine diets affected quality and consumer eating quality of organic pork. Pigs ( n =500, initial weight=27.8±3.5kg, 10 weeks of age) were assigned to Control or Rye treatments (50 pigs/pen; 5 pens/treatment). Control pigs received corn, soybean meal-based organic diets and rye pigs received diets with organic hybrid rye replacing 50% of the corn in control diets. At market weight (average=127 kg, 23 weeks of age), 40 pigs/treatment were selected for evaluation of carcass and pork quality. A consumer panel consisting of 72 adults conducted sensory evaluations of pork from 16 pigs/treatment. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix or Analysis of Variance procedure of SAS. Measures of carcass (carcass weight and length, dressing %, chill loss, backfat thickness and loin area) and pork quality (pH at 45 min and 24 h, objective color scores of L*, a*, b*, subjective marbling and color scores, and shear force) were not different between treatments (all P >0.13). The consumer panelists did not detect differences in juiciness, off-flavor, or liking ratings of pork between treatment groups (all P >0.35), except a tendency ( P =0.075) of tougher pork from Rye pigs than from Control pigs. These data indicate that replacing 50% of corn with hybrid rye in diets for growing-finishing pigs did not negatively impact quality or consumer eating quality of organic pork.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organic Agriculture
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-025-00513-9
Primary Topic
Food Quality and Safety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of dietary hybrid rye on quality and consumer eating quality of pork from pigs raised under organic conditions

Adrienne Hilbrands, L. J. Johnston, Y. Li, Giuseppe Lima et al.
Organic Agriculture
Food Quality and Safety Studies
article

Effects of dietary hybrid rye on quality and consumer eating quality of pork from pigs raised under organic conditions

Adrienne Hilbrands, L. J. Johnston, Y. Li, Giuseppe Lima, Marie Kavanagh, Ray Cox
article en

Abstract

Abstract Winter hybrid rye has become of interest to organic farmers in the Midwest region of the United States due to its potential for high yields, hardy overwintering, and environmental benefits. We investigated whether inclusion of hybrid rye in swine diets affected quality and consumer eating quality of organic pork. Pigs ( n =500, initial weight=27.8±3.5kg, 10 weeks of age) were assigned to Control or Rye treatments (50 pigs/pen; 5 pens/treatment). Control pigs received corn, soybean meal-based organic diets and rye pigs received diets with organic hybrid rye replacing 50% of the corn in control diets. At market weight (average=127 kg, 23 weeks of age), 40 pigs/treatment were selected for evaluation of carcass and pork quality. A consumer panel consisting of 72 adults conducted sensory evaluations of pork from 16 pigs/treatment. Data were analyzed using the Glimmix or Analysis of Variance procedure of SAS. Measures of carcass (carcass weight and length, dressing %, chill loss, backfat thickness and loin area) and pork quality (pH at 45 min and 24 h, objective color scores of L*, a*, b*, subjective marbling and color scores, and shear force) were not different between treatments (all P >0.13). The consumer panelists did not detect differences in juiciness, off-flavor, or liking ratings of pork between treatment groups (all P >0.35), except a tendency ( P =0.075) of tougher pork from Rye pigs than from Control pigs. These data indicate that replacing 50% of corn with hybrid rye in diets for growing-finishing pigs did not negatively impact quality or consumer eating quality of organic pork.

Organic AgricultureVol. 15(3)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota Morris (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Food Quality and Safety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.