Strategic Anxiety and Security Dilemma in the Indo-Pacific: A Defensive Realist Analysis of Australia–China Relations

This article explores the deterioration of security relations between Australia and China from the perspective of defensive realism, with a focus on the dynamics of security dilemmas. In the study, Australia's strategic shift has led to a feedback loop of misunderstanding, military escalation, and alliance dependence, particularly in the context of AUKUS, the South China Sea, and Taiwan (China). This article also emphasizes the limitations of defensive realism by integrating the perspective of ontological security theory, arguing that Australia's behavior is not only influenced by material power considerations, but also by identity anxiety and normative consistency with the Western dominated rule-based order. The report concludes by proposing institutional mechanisms, including military hotlines, transparency measures, and inclusive dialogue, as a way to manage strategic distrust and mitigate escalation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/jsoce.2025.070307
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Anxiety and Security Dilemma in the Indo-Pacific: A Defensive Realist Analysis of Australia–China Relations

Journal of Sociology and Ethnology
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Strategic Anxiety and Security Dilemma in the Indo-Pacific: A Defensive Realist Analysis of Australia–China Relations

article en

Abstract

This article explores the deterioration of security relations between Australia and China from the perspective of defensive realism, with a focus on the dynamics of security dilemmas. In the study, Australia's strategic shift has led to a feedback loop of misunderstanding, military escalation, and alliance dependence, particularly in the context of AUKUS, the South China Sea, and Taiwan (China). This article also emphasizes the limitations of defensive realism by integrating the perspective of ontological security theory, arguing that Australia's behavior is not only influenced by material power considerations, but also by identity anxiety and normative consistency with the Western dominated rule-based order. The report concludes by proposing institutional mechanisms, including military hotlines, transparency measures, and inclusive dialogue, as a way to manage strategic distrust and mitigate escalation.

Journal of Sociology and EthnologyVol. 7(3)
Monash University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.