Dynamic gender differences in reporting work limitations: Comparative evidence from the United States and Europe

The gender gap in self-reported work limitations among individuals aged 50 – 70 has persisted over time and across countries. We investigate whether this gap reflects actual differences in work limitations or variations in reporting styles between genders. Using the anchoring vignettes approach and leveraging vignette survey data from the United States and Europe, we examine how men and women assess the severity of identical work limitations related to pain, cardiovascular health, and depression. Our findings show that men tend to classify identical work limitations as more severe than women. This gender difference in reporting styles is consistent across both the U.S. and Europe and throughout the time periods studied. Once we account for these reporting differences, the gender gap in self-reported work limitations narrows or diminishes. These results have broad implications for research on self-reported work disability and highlight the need for caution when using self-reported measures to assess disability patterns and trends.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Population Studies
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1969
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic gender differences in reporting work limitations: Comparative evidence from the United States and Europe

Danan Gu, Na Yin
International Journal of Population Studies
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Dynamic gender differences in reporting work limitations: Comparative evidence from the United States and Europe

Danan Gu, Na Yin
article en

Abstract

The gender gap in self-reported work limitations among individuals aged 50 – 70 has persisted over time and across countries. We investigate whether this gap reflects actual differences in work limitations or variations in reporting styles between genders. Using the anchoring vignettes approach and leveraging vignette survey data from the United States and Europe, we examine how men and women assess the severity of identical work limitations related to pain, cardiovascular health, and depression. Our findings show that men tend to classify identical work limitations as more severe than women. This gender difference in reporting styles is consistent across both the U.S. and Europe and throughout the time periods studied. Once we account for these reporting differences, the gender gap in self-reported work limitations narrows or diminishes. These results have broad implications for research on self-reported work disability and highlight the need for caution when using self-reported measures to assess disability patterns and trends.

International Journal of Population StudiesVol. 11(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic gender differences in reporting work limitations: Comparative evidence from the United States and Europe — Danan Gu, Na Yin · International Journal of Population Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS