Understanding Australian adults’ preferences for setting goals to reduce unhealthy food and beverage intake: a cross-sectional study

Overconsumption of unhealthy, discretionary, foods and beverages are associated with an increased risk of weight gain and non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. This cross-sectional study explored preferences for setting goals to reduce discretionary food and beverage consumption. The online survey included items about discretionary food and beverage intake, goal setting preferences to reduce intake, habit strength, personality traits, and demographic characteristics. A total of 2664 Australian adults completed the survey. The sample was mostly female (65.9%), half (52.8%) were aged between 30-49 years, and the median intake of discretionary food and beverages was 4.9 (IQR: 3.6 to 7.2) serves per day. Multinomial logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression models were used to explore demographic and psychological predictors of the helpfulness of long-term and short-term goals, elimination and gradual goals, specific food goals, specific eating occasion and food goals, self-set goals, collaboratively set goals, and assigned goals. The results showed participants with higher habit strength had greater odds of finding short-term (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.86), gradual (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29), specific (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.84-1.76), assigned (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.66) and collaborative goals (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53) helpful. The results also indicated that age and gender were important predictors of goal setting preferences, particularly for long-term goals, elimination goals, broad goals, and collaborative goals. Interventions to reduce discretionary food and beverage intake are needed and consideration of goal setting preferences could be a novel way to developing more tailored and effective dietary interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nutritional Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2025.10022
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Australian adults’ preferences for setting goals to reduce unhealthy food and beverage intake: a cross-sectional study

Gilly A. Hendrie, Chelsea E. Mauch, Caitlin A. Howlett, Abraham M. Fuchs
Journal of Nutritional Science
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Understanding Australian adults’ preferences for setting goals to reduce unhealthy food and beverage intake: a cross-sectional study

Gilly A. Hendrie, Chelsea E. Mauch, Caitlin A. Howlett, Abraham M. Fuchs
article en

Abstract

Overconsumption of unhealthy, discretionary, foods and beverages are associated with an increased risk of weight gain and non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. This cross-sectional study explored preferences for setting goals to reduce discretionary food and beverage consumption. The online survey included items about discretionary food and beverage intake, goal setting preferences to reduce intake, habit strength, personality traits, and demographic characteristics. A total of 2664 Australian adults completed the survey. The sample was mostly female (65.9%), half (52.8%) were aged between 30-49 years, and the median intake of discretionary food and beverages was 4.9 (IQR: 3.6 to 7.2) serves per day. Multinomial logistic regression and ordinal logistic regression models were used to explore demographic and psychological predictors of the helpfulness of long-term and short-term goals, elimination and gradual goals, specific food goals, specific eating occasion and food goals, self-set goals, collaboratively set goals, and assigned goals. The results showed participants with higher habit strength had greater odds of finding short-term (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.86), gradual (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29), specific (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.84-1.76), assigned (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.66) and collaborative goals (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53) helpful. The results also indicated that age and gender were important predictors of goal setting preferences, particularly for long-term goals, elimination goals, broad goals, and collaborative goals. Interventions to reduce discretionary food and beverage intake are needed and consideration of goal setting preferences could be a novel way to developing more tailored and effective dietary interventions.

Journal of Nutritional ScienceVol. 14
Flinders University (AU), CSIRO Health and Biosecurity (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.