Digital Currency and Global Monetary Hegemony: Korea's Strategic Positioning

This study analyzes how the proliferation of digital currencies is transforming global monetary hegemony and the international financial order, while exploring the strategic positioning of Korea as a middle power. The digital currency strategies of major countries—the U.S., China, EU, and BRICS—differ in terms of technology, regulation, and policy, leading to a multipolar and fragmented currency landscape. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and a 2×2 matrix (algorithmic sovereignty, crypto-mercantilism) based on policy documents and institutional cases, the study compares national strategies. The findings suggest that Korea should position itself as a regulatory coordinator, balancing technological autonomy with international cooperation, and act as a standard negotiator and financial hub. This research provides practical policy implications for middle powers in the digital currency era.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Association for International Commerce and Information
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15798/kaici.2025.27.2.135
Primary Topic
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Currency and Global Monetary Hegemony: Korea's Strategic Positioning

Yun-Seung Ko
Korea Association for International Commerce and Information
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
article

Digital Currency and Global Monetary Hegemony: Korea's Strategic Positioning

Yun-Seung Ko
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how the proliferation of digital currencies is transforming global monetary hegemony and the international financial order, while exploring the strategic positioning of Korea as a middle power. The digital currency strategies of major countries—the U.S., China, EU, and BRICS—differ in terms of technology, regulation, and policy, leading to a multipolar and fragmented currency landscape. Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and a 2×2 matrix (algorithmic sovereignty, crypto-mercantilism) based on policy documents and institutional cases, the study compares national strategies. The findings suggest that Korea should position itself as a regulatory coordinator, balancing technological autonomy with international cooperation, and act as a standard negotiator and financial hub. This research provides practical policy implications for middle powers in the digital currency era.

Korea Association for International Commerce and InformationVol. 27(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.