Laboratory testing of large diameter open caisson sinking friction in sand

The construction procedure for open-dug in-situ caisson shafts involves concurrent casting of reinforced concrete walls and excavation of soil from within the structure. This process causes the shaft to ‘sink’ into the ground, driven by the self-weight of the walls. A key design concern during construction is the build-up of frictional stresses (skin friction) on the exterior surface of the caisson walls by the surrounding soil. A lubricant filled annulus is typically used to minimise skin friction, however recent field monitoring results suggest this may not always be effective in sands. Ensuring minimisation of skin friction in sands is therefore a critical design priority. This paper presents results from novel experimental testing that simulates the sinking process at a reduced scale. Four tests were conducted focusing on two key factors that influence skin friction: annulus formation and lubrication. Interface stress sensors were used to measure the skin friction and normal stresses at the interface, whilst particle image velocimetry was used to track soil displacements. The results show that lubrication, either with or without an annulus, effectively reduces skin friction. However, lubricating without an annulus only leads to localised friction reduction, suggesting close spacing of lubricant ports can be used to ensure effective friction reduction even without effective annulus formation. The results also show annulus formation without effective lubrication can lead to an increase in skin friction, the opposite of friction fatigue for displacement piles, representing the first experimental measurements to validate caisson field monitoring results in the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.106891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory testing of large diameter open caisson sinking friction in sand

Bryn M. Phillips, Alexander W. Swallow, Brian Sheil, Jack O. Templeman
1 citations
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
0.95
article

Laboratory testing of large diameter open caisson sinking friction in sand

Bryn M. Phillips, Alexander W. Swallow, Brian Sheil, Jack O. Templeman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The construction procedure for open-dug in-situ caisson shafts involves concurrent casting of reinforced concrete walls and excavation of soil from within the structure. This process causes the shaft to ‘sink’ into the ground, driven by the self-weight of the walls. A key design concern during construction is the build-up of frictional stresses (skin friction) on the exterior surface of the caisson walls by the surrounding soil. A lubricant filled annulus is typically used to minimise skin friction, however recent field monitoring results suggest this may not always be effective in sands. Ensuring minimisation of skin friction in sands is therefore a critical design priority. This paper presents results from novel experimental testing that simulates the sinking process at a reduced scale. Four tests were conducted focusing on two key factors that influence skin friction: annulus formation and lubrication. Interface stress sensors were used to measure the skin friction and normal stresses at the interface, whilst particle image velocimetry was used to track soil displacements. The results show that lubrication, either with or without an annulus, effectively reduces skin friction. However, lubricating without an annulus only leads to localised friction reduction, suggesting close spacing of lubricant ports can be used to ensure effective friction reduction even without effective annulus formation. The results also show annulus formation without effective lubrication can lead to an increase in skin friction, the opposite of friction fatigue for displacement piles, representing the first experimental measurements to validate caisson field monitoring results in the literature.

Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyVol. 165
University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Burke Foundation (US), Science Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.