Comparative analysis of carbon neutrality policies in Korea, China and Japan: Greenhouse gas monitoring network and mitigation strategies

Achieving carbon neutrality in response to climate change necessitates the establishment of a comprehensive system for integrated greenhouse gas (GHG) observation and verification capable of ensuring precise emission assessments and credible evaluation of policy effectiveness. Although South Korea, China, and Japan are geographically proximate, their climate governance trajectories have diverged due to differences in available energy resources, industrial structures, and political-economic systems. Nevertheless, all three countries share a common trend in advancing science-based GHG management using multi-platform atmospheric observation networks relying on satellite, airborne, and ground-based measurements. South Korea has been a relative latecomer to implementing empirically grounded GHG monitoring compared to China and Japan. However, South Korea’s proactive engagement in shaping international standards for urban GHG monitoring presents a timely opportunity to establish a robust and scalable national framework. This system will be extended to subnational and municipal levels, enhancing the scientific credibility and objectivity of local climate policy assessments and facilitating compliance with international reporting obligations. The Korean Greenhouse Gas Watch is envisioned as a core national infrastructure supporting mitigation, adaptation, and ex-post policy evaluation. Korea aims to simultaneously strengthen its observational capacity and foster sustained cooperation across East Asia through knowledge exchange and collaborative GHG governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate Change Research
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2025.16.3.487
Primary Topic
Environmental Policies and Emissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of carbon neutrality policies in Korea, China and Japan: Greenhouse gas monitoring network and mitigation strategies

Sok Kuh Kang, Dae-Gyun Lee, K. H. Moon, Jongchun Lee et al.
Journal of Climate Change Research
Environmental Policies and Emissions
article

Comparative analysis of carbon neutrality policies in Korea, China and Japan: Greenhouse gas monitoring network and mitigation strategies

Sok Kuh Kang, Dae-Gyun Lee, K. H. Moon, Jongchun Lee, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyo-Jin Eom, Hyeogki Chae
article en

Abstract

Achieving carbon neutrality in response to climate change necessitates the establishment of a comprehensive system for integrated greenhouse gas (GHG) observation and verification capable of ensuring precise emission assessments and credible evaluation of policy effectiveness. Although South Korea, China, and Japan are geographically proximate, their climate governance trajectories have diverged due to differences in available energy resources, industrial structures, and political-economic systems. Nevertheless, all three countries share a common trend in advancing science-based GHG management using multi-platform atmospheric observation networks relying on satellite, airborne, and ground-based measurements. South Korea has been a relative latecomer to implementing empirically grounded GHG monitoring compared to China and Japan. However, South Korea’s proactive engagement in shaping international standards for urban GHG monitoring presents a timely opportunity to establish a robust and scalable national framework. This system will be extended to subnational and municipal levels, enhancing the scientific credibility and objectivity of local climate policy assessments and facilitating compliance with international reporting obligations. The Korean Greenhouse Gas Watch is envisioned as a core national infrastructure supporting mitigation, adaptation, and ex-post policy evaluation. Korea aims to simultaneously strengthen its observational capacity and foster sustained cooperation across East Asia through knowledge exchange and collaborative GHG governance.

Journal of Climate Change ResearchVol. 16(3-2)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Environmental Policies and Emissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.