Peran Pengawasan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia: Studi Komparatif Nationale Ombudsman dan Riksdagens Ombudsman

The development of legal science is very rapid, so it is inseparable from the concept of the division of powers of state institutions. The authority is used to carry out public services and the function of the citizens' human rights approach. This approach is a form of legal protection for the people as the main part of administrative law. One of the holders of legal protection powers for citizens is the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is a projustitia state institution in various countries and ensures the legal protection of citizens against government actions. However, in this context in Indonesia, the position of the Ombudsman as a concept of legal protection through an administrative law approach has not been maximised with a number of authorities. This problem occurs because administrative law in Indonesia does not have a special position in its legal order, one example is that there is no codification of Indonesian administrative law like in other countries such as the Netherlands having Algemen Wet Bestuurrecht (AWB). In Indonesia, it forms a special rule or material guideline, namely Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which cannot be said to be a material administrative law concept. This is because the regulation is not theoretically based on administrative law. So, it is necessary to have an administrative law policy in terms of preventive and repressive law enforcement. Therefore, this research uses the norm method based on statutory, conceptual and comparative legal approaches. With legal materials using comparative juridical analysis of the ombudsman institutional system in the Netherlands and Sweden. So that this research shows a much different concept of authority between the Indonesian Ombudsman, the Dutch Nationale Ombudsman functions as a government watchdog mentioned in Article 78a of the Dutch Constitution, and the Riksdagens Ombudsman. Sweden which is an organ of parliament to carry out supervision of the executive as a state organiser by issuing legal products, namely recommendations and also has the authority to conduct conciliation and mediation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Lex Renaissance
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol10.iss1.art4
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peran Pengawasan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia: Studi Komparatif Nationale Ombudsman dan Riksdagens Ombudsman

Muklis Al'Anam, Hendro Prabowo
Jurnal Lex Renaissance
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Peran Pengawasan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia: Studi Komparatif Nationale Ombudsman dan Riksdagens Ombudsman

Muklis Al'Anam, Hendro Prabowo
article en

Abstract

The development of legal science is very rapid, so it is inseparable from the concept of the division of powers of state institutions. The authority is used to carry out public services and the function of the citizens' human rights approach. This approach is a form of legal protection for the people as the main part of administrative law. One of the holders of legal protection powers for citizens is the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman is a projustitia state institution in various countries and ensures the legal protection of citizens against government actions. However, in this context in Indonesia, the position of the Ombudsman as a concept of legal protection through an administrative law approach has not been maximised with a number of authorities. This problem occurs because administrative law in Indonesia does not have a special position in its legal order, one example is that there is no codification of Indonesian administrative law like in other countries such as the Netherlands having Algemen Wet Bestuurrecht (AWB). In Indonesia, it forms a special rule or material guideline, namely Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which cannot be said to be a material administrative law concept. This is because the regulation is not theoretically based on administrative law. So, it is necessary to have an administrative law policy in terms of preventive and repressive law enforcement. Therefore, this research uses the norm method based on statutory, conceptual and comparative legal approaches. With legal materials using comparative juridical analysis of the ombudsman institutional system in the Netherlands and Sweden. So that this research shows a much different concept of authority between the Indonesian Ombudsman, the Dutch Nationale Ombudsman functions as a government watchdog mentioned in Article 78a of the Dutch Constitution, and the Riksdagens Ombudsman. Sweden which is an organ of parliament to carry out supervision of the executive as a state organiser by issuing legal products, namely recommendations and also has the authority to conduct conciliation and mediation.

Jurnal Lex RenaissanceVol. 10(1)
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.