Techno-economic and environmental assessment of green hydrogen production in multiple Australian regions using different electrolyzer technologies

The global transition toward a carbon-neutral economy has positioned green hydrogen as a pivotal zero-emission energy carrier. Australia, with its abundant solar and wind resources, is well-positioned to lead in renewable hydrogen production. However, its techno-economic feasibility remains highly dependent on electrolyzer technology selection, site-specific renewable availability, and optimal system design. Therefore, this study develops a unified, sustainability-driven techno-economic framework to evaluate off-grid green hydrogen production across twelve Australian regions. The off-grid system is benchmarked against grid-connected configurations to validate its techno-economic feasibility under varying resource conditions. It integrates proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEMEL), alkaline electrolyzer (AEL), and solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEL) technologies with a standardized hybrid renewable energy system—comprising 60% solar PV, 40% wind, battery storage, electrolyzers, and hydrogen tanks. System components are optimally sized based on projected hydrogen demand, and performance is assessed using multi-criteria indicators including levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH), net present cost (NPC), lifecycle emissions, employment generation, and human development index (HDI) improvement. Among all regions, Pilbara demonstrated the lowest LCOH of $3.38/kg and a 9.29% Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Sensitivity analysis identified solar capacity factor and electrolyzer CAPEX as the most influential economic drivers. The proposed framework confirms that green hydrogen can reduce lifecycle emissions by up to 95% compared to grey hydrogen while also enhancing regional employment and HDI, particularly in remote communities. • Standardized cross-regional assessment of green hydrogen in twelve Australian regions. • Electrolyzer-specific models for PEMEL, AEL, and SOEL under hybrid solar-wind systems. • Lifecycle CO 2 emissions, job creation, and HDI included in sustainability analysis. • Parametric sensitivity analysis identifies key cost drivers for hydrogen feasibility. • Off-grid systems offer regional competitiveness over grid-connected alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable Energy
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123879
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic and environmental assessment of green hydrogen production in multiple Australian regions using different electrolyzer technologies

Tushar Kanti Roy
11 citations
Renewable Energy
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
5.85
article

Techno-economic and environmental assessment of green hydrogen production in multiple Australian regions using different electrolyzer technologies

Tushar Kanti Roy
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The global transition toward a carbon-neutral economy has positioned green hydrogen as a pivotal zero-emission energy carrier. Australia, with its abundant solar and wind resources, is well-positioned to lead in renewable hydrogen production. However, its techno-economic feasibility remains highly dependent on electrolyzer technology selection, site-specific renewable availability, and optimal system design. Therefore, this study develops a unified, sustainability-driven techno-economic framework to evaluate off-grid green hydrogen production across twelve Australian regions. The off-grid system is benchmarked against grid-connected configurations to validate its techno-economic feasibility under varying resource conditions. It integrates proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEMEL), alkaline electrolyzer (AEL), and solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEL) technologies with a standardized hybrid renewable energy system—comprising 60% solar PV, 40% wind, battery storage, electrolyzers, and hydrogen tanks. System components are optimally sized based on projected hydrogen demand, and performance is assessed using multi-criteria indicators including levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH), net present cost (NPC), lifecycle emissions, employment generation, and human development index (HDI) improvement. Among all regions, Pilbara demonstrated the lowest LCOH of $3.38/kg and a 9.29% Internal Rate of Return (IRR). Sensitivity analysis identified solar capacity factor and electrolyzer CAPEX as the most influential economic drivers. The proposed framework confirms that green hydrogen can reduce lifecycle emissions by up to 95% compared to grey hydrogen while also enhancing regional employment and HDI, particularly in remote communities. • Standardized cross-regional assessment of green hydrogen in twelve Australian regions. • Electrolyzer-specific models for PEMEL, AEL, and SOEL under hybrid solar-wind systems. • Lifecycle CO 2 emissions, job creation, and HDI included in sustainability analysis. • Parametric sensitivity analysis identifies key cost drivers for hydrogen feasibility. • Off-grid systems offer regional competitiveness over grid-connected alternatives.

Renewable EnergyVol. 256
Macquarie University (AU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
5.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.