FRIES: Framework for inconsistency estimation of saliency metrics

Saliency maps are widely used as a post-hoc approach to explain the decision-making process of Deep Learning (DL) based image classification models, but evaluating their fidelity remains a complex problem. While saliency metrics have been introduced to evaluate the fidelity of saliency maps, existing saliency metrics, such as perturbation-based saliency metrics, have been previously reported to demonstrate statistical inconsistency. Although inconsistencies have been noted in different works, there exists no mechanism for estimating the same, i.e., Inconsistency Estimation (IE). Our primary objective is to address this limitation, and therefore, we propose a framework to estimate the inconsistency of saliency metrics for any given DL model. The framework enables building IE models for estimating the inconsistency by employing a set of perturbation types and schemes. The framework’s modular architecture provides flexibility across (i) perturbation types (Inpainting, Uniform, and Gaussian blur), (ii) perturbation schemes (pixel-wise and patch-wise), (iii) learning mechanisms (Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers) and (iv) IE modeling techniques (bagging and boosting). Extensive experimental results are shown on three well-known DL architectures (Inception-V3, Xception, and ResNet-50) on three different public datasets, including the Imagenette, Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset, and PASCAL VOC 2007, along with results on ViTs for Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset, and PASCAL VOC 2007. With a comprehensive evaluation of seven different perturbation types that include two inpainting, two Gaussian blur (with kernel widths of 0.9 and 1.5), and three uniform perturbations, our work shows the effectiveness of the proposed approach in estimating inconsistency. Statistically founded tests such as repeated cross-validation and the Permutation Test further validate the idea of the proposed framework for estimating the inconsistency of saliency metrics across unseen perturbations, making it useful in real-world scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pattern Recognition
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.112136
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRIES: Framework for inconsistency estimation of saliency metrics

Revoti Prasad Bora, Raymond Veldhuis, Philipp Terhörst, Raghavendra Ramachandra et al.
1 citations
Pattern Recognition
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

FRIES: Framework for inconsistency estimation of saliency metrics

Revoti Prasad Bora, Raymond Veldhuis, Philipp Terhörst, Raghavendra Ramachandra, Kiran B. Raja
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Saliency maps are widely used as a post-hoc approach to explain the decision-making process of Deep Learning (DL) based image classification models, but evaluating their fidelity remains a complex problem. While saliency metrics have been introduced to evaluate the fidelity of saliency maps, existing saliency metrics, such as perturbation-based saliency metrics, have been previously reported to demonstrate statistical inconsistency. Although inconsistencies have been noted in different works, there exists no mechanism for estimating the same, i.e., Inconsistency Estimation (IE). Our primary objective is to address this limitation, and therefore, we propose a framework to estimate the inconsistency of saliency metrics for any given DL model. The framework enables building IE models for estimating the inconsistency by employing a set of perturbation types and schemes. The framework’s modular architecture provides flexibility across (i) perturbation types (Inpainting, Uniform, and Gaussian blur), (ii) perturbation schemes (pixel-wise and patch-wise), (iii) learning mechanisms (Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Transformers) and (iv) IE modeling techniques (bagging and boosting). Extensive experimental results are shown on three well-known DL architectures (Inception-V3, Xception, and ResNet-50) on three different public datasets, including the Imagenette, Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset, and PASCAL VOC 2007, along with results on ViTs for Oxford-IIIT Pets Dataset, and PASCAL VOC 2007. With a comprehensive evaluation of seven different perturbation types that include two inpainting, two Gaussian blur (with kernel widths of 0.9 and 1.5), and three uniform perturbations, our work shows the effectiveness of the proposed approach in estimating inconsistency. Statistically founded tests such as repeated cross-validation and the Permutation Test further validate the idea of the proposed framework for estimating the inconsistency of saliency metrics across unseen perturbations, making it useful in real-world scenarios.

Pattern RecognitionVol. 171
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Paderborn University (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.