Developing and validating an artificial intelligence ethical awareness scale for secondary and university students: Cultivating ethical awareness through problem-solving with artificial intelligence tools

Although there is growing attention to artificial intelligence (AI) ethics education with the rapid surge of AI technology, little research has explored the use of problem-solving to cultivate students’ AI ethical awareness. To address this gap, this study developed a scale to multidimensionally measure AI ethical awareness and cultivated students’ AI ethical awareness through problem-solving using AI tools within an AI literacy course. A total of 573 Hong Kong secondary and university students participated in a 14-hour course. Data was collected through the AI Ethical Awareness Scale (AIEAS) questionnaire and students’ self-reflective writings. The AIEAS framework, encompassing three dimensions, was based on the Belmont Report principles of human autonomy, beneficence, and fairness. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported this three-factor structure, with nine items retained. Multigroup CFA results demonstrated strong measurement invariance across gender, education level, and programming knowledge. All Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficient values exceeded 0.70, indicating satisfactory internal consistency and fair temporal stability. Furthermore, students’ ethical awareness showed a significant improvement following the course intervention. This study not only provides a robust measure for researchers and practitioners to assess students’ ethical awareness through behavioural engagement but also demonstrates the necessity of implementing an education course for cultivating ethical awareness through integrating experience and reflection. • Developing and validating a multidimensional AI ethical awareness scale (AIEAS) through problem-solving in a course • A diverse sample of secondary school and university students was used across school types and disciplines • The three-factor AIEAS composing human autonomy, beneficence, and justice showed good validity and reliability • Students’ ethical awareness was enhanced through the AI literacy course based on the AIEAS and reflective writings • This study confirmed the effect of cultivating AI ethical awareness through problem-solving using AI tools

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100447
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and validating an artificial intelligence ethical awareness scale for secondary and university students: Cultivating ethical awareness through problem-solving with artificial intelligence tools

Siu Cheung Kong, Jinyu Zhu
9 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.89
article

Developing and validating an artificial intelligence ethical awareness scale for secondary and university students: Cultivating ethical awareness through problem-solving with artificial intelligence tools

Siu Cheung Kong, Jinyu Zhu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Although there is growing attention to artificial intelligence (AI) ethics education with the rapid surge of AI technology, little research has explored the use of problem-solving to cultivate students’ AI ethical awareness. To address this gap, this study developed a scale to multidimensionally measure AI ethical awareness and cultivated students’ AI ethical awareness through problem-solving using AI tools within an AI literacy course. A total of 573 Hong Kong secondary and university students participated in a 14-hour course. Data was collected through the AI Ethical Awareness Scale (AIEAS) questionnaire and students’ self-reflective writings. The AIEAS framework, encompassing three dimensions, was based on the Belmont Report principles of human autonomy, beneficence, and fairness. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported this three-factor structure, with nine items retained. Multigroup CFA results demonstrated strong measurement invariance across gender, education level, and programming knowledge. All Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficient values exceeded 0.70, indicating satisfactory internal consistency and fair temporal stability. Furthermore, students’ ethical awareness showed a significant improvement following the course intervention. This study not only provides a robust measure for researchers and practitioners to assess students’ ethical awareness through behavioural engagement but also demonstrates the necessity of implementing an education course for cultivating ethical awareness through integrating experience and reflection. • Developing and validating a multidimensional AI ethical awareness scale (AIEAS) through problem-solving in a course • A diverse sample of secondary school and university students was used across school types and disciplines • The three-factor AIEAS composing human autonomy, beneficence, and justice showed good validity and reliability • Students’ ethical awareness was enhanced through the AI literacy course based on the AIEAS and reflective writings • This study confirmed the effect of cultivating AI ethical awareness through problem-solving using AI tools

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Li Ka Shing Foundation, University Grants Committee, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
5.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.