An Extended Interval‐Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy VIKOR Approach With Logarithmic Distance Measures for Service Quality Evaluation of University Library
Evaluating service quality presents a multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) challenge, involving numerous factors that contribute to its complexity. Traditional approaches to assessing service quality frequently struggle to encapsulate the ambiguity and uncertainty in user experiences, particularly when confronted with intricate, multidimensional indicators of service quality. In this paper, we introduce two novel distance measures based on logarithmic function for interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets (IVPFSs). The important properties of the new measure are not only proved but also verified by numerical examples. On this basis, the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method is extended to the interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment to evaluate the service quality of university libraries. The research results show that the proposed method has significant results in improving the accuracy of evaluation and coping with complex index systems. Finally, comparative analysis and sensitivity analysis are carried out. The results of these analyses further validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, which provides a new and more reliable way for service quality evaluation.
Authors
- Azleena Mohd Kassim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-6535)
- Donglai Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0816-9145)
- Sijia Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3694-6473)
- Zhe Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8580-9655)
- Zhuliang Yu
Institutions
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Lingnan Normal University (CN)
- Chongqing University (CN)
- Jadara University (JO)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Xinyu University (CN)
- Mudanjiang Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Mathematics
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1155/jom/9966857
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.43