Multi-Layer and Profile Soil Moisture Estimation and Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Multi-Frequency (Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-Band) and Quad-Polarization Airborne SAR Data from Synchronous Observation Experiment in Liao River Basin, China

Validating the potential of multi-frequency synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for multi-layer and profile soil moisture (SM) estimation modeling, we conducted an airborne multi-frequency SAR joint observation experiment (AMFSEX) over the Liao River Basin in China. The experiment simultaneously acquired airborne high spatial resolution quad-polarization (quad-pol) SAR data at five frequencies, including the Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-band. A preliminary “vegetation–soil” parameter estimation model based on the multi-frequency SAR data was established. Theoretical penetration depths of the multi-frequency SAR data were analyzed using the Dobson empirical model and the Hallikainen modified model. On this basis, a water cloud model (WCM) constrained by multi-polarization weighted and penetration depth weighted parameters was used to analyze the estimation accuracy of the multi-layer and profile SM (0–50 cm depth) under different vegetation types (grassland, farmland, and woodland). Overall, the estimation error (root mean square error, RMSE) of the surface SM (0–5 cm depth) ranged from 0.058 cm3/cm3 to 0.079 cm3/cm3, and increased with radar frequency. For multi-layer and profile SM (3 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm depth), the RMSE ranged from 0.040 cm3/cm3 to 0.069 cm3/cm3. Finally, a multi-input multi-output regression model (Gaussian process regression) was used to simultaneously estimate the multi-layer and profile SM. For surface SM, the overall RMSE was approximately 0.040 cm3/cm3. For multi-layer and profile SM, the overall RMSE ranged from 0.031 cm3/cm3 to 0.064 cm3/cm3. The estimation accuracy achieved by coupling the multi-source data (multi-frequency SAR data, multispectral data, and soil parameters) was superior to that obtained using the SAR data alone. The optimal SM penetration depth varied across different vegetation cover types, generally falling within the range of 10–30 cm, which holds true for both the scattering model and the regression model. This study provides methodological guidance for the development of multi-layer and profile SM estimation models based on the multi-frequency SAR data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17142096
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Layer and Profile Soil Moisture Estimation and Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Multi-Frequency (Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-Band) and Quad-Polarization Airborne SAR Data from Synchronous Observation Experiment in Liao River Basin, China

Lei Shi, Jie Yang, Lingli Zhao, Qi Dou et al.
3 citations
Water
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
2.40
article

Multi-Layer and Profile Soil Moisture Estimation and Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Multi-Frequency (Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-Band) and Quad-Polarization Airborne SAR Data from Synchronous Observation Experiment in Liao River Basin, China

Lei Shi, Jie Yang, Lingli Zhao, Qi Dou, Weidong Sun, Chaoya Dang, Jiaxin Qian, Hongtao Shi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Validating the potential of multi-frequency synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data for multi-layer and profile soil moisture (SM) estimation modeling, we conducted an airborne multi-frequency SAR joint observation experiment (AMFSEX) over the Liao River Basin in China. The experiment simultaneously acquired airborne high spatial resolution quad-polarization (quad-pol) SAR data at five frequencies, including the Ka-, X-, C-, S-, and L-band. A preliminary “vegetation–soil” parameter estimation model based on the multi-frequency SAR data was established. Theoretical penetration depths of the multi-frequency SAR data were analyzed using the Dobson empirical model and the Hallikainen modified model. On this basis, a water cloud model (WCM) constrained by multi-polarization weighted and penetration depth weighted parameters was used to analyze the estimation accuracy of the multi-layer and profile SM (0–50 cm depth) under different vegetation types (grassland, farmland, and woodland). Overall, the estimation error (root mean square error, RMSE) of the surface SM (0–5 cm depth) ranged from 0.058 cm3/cm3 to 0.079 cm3/cm3, and increased with radar frequency. For multi-layer and profile SM (3 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm depth), the RMSE ranged from 0.040 cm3/cm3 to 0.069 cm3/cm3. Finally, a multi-input multi-output regression model (Gaussian process regression) was used to simultaneously estimate the multi-layer and profile SM. For surface SM, the overall RMSE was approximately 0.040 cm3/cm3. For multi-layer and profile SM, the overall RMSE ranged from 0.031 cm3/cm3 to 0.064 cm3/cm3. The estimation accuracy achieved by coupling the multi-source data (multi-frequency SAR data, multispectral data, and soil parameters) was superior to that obtained using the SAR data alone. The optimal SM penetration depth varied across different vegetation cover types, generally falling within the range of 10–30 cm, which holds true for both the scattering model and the regression model. This study provides methodological guidance for the development of multi-layer and profile SM estimation models based on the multi-frequency SAR data.

WaterVol. 17(14)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing (CN), Institute of Soil Science (CN)
European Space Agency, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hebei Normal University, Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, Jiangsu Normal University, China University of Mining and Technology, China University of Geosciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.