Performance comparison of conventional biological treatment process and membrane bioreactor treating common industrial effluent

Industrial effluent is challenging for wastewater treatment plants due to its complexity, toxicity and variable composition. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of industrial wastewater treatment between a lab-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a full-scale anoxic/oxic (A/O) process. The wastewater used was after primary sedimentation tank, which involved lime or ferric coagulant. The results showed that the treated water quality from both systems was satisfied the national effluent standard for wastewater (column B of QCVN 40-MT:2011/BTNMT). The effluent from A/O process contained 74 ± 11 mg/L of COD, 8.3 ± 1.9 mg/L of TN, 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/L of TP, and 201± 38 Pt-Co of color. Meanwhile, the concentrations of COD, TN, TP, and color in the effluent of MBR system were 88 ± 21, 23.2 ± 4.6, 0.3 ± 0.2 mg/L, and 220 ± 98 Pt-Co, respectively. The removal rates of COD, TN, TP and color of anoxic/oxic process were 234 ± 119, 16 ± 3, 0.3 ± 0.2 mg/L.day, 213 ± 58 Pt-Co/L.day, respectively. The removal rates of COD, TN, TP, and color in MBR system were 1.6, 1.3, 10.3, and 2.1 times higher than those in the A/O process, respectively. Although the A/O process in industrial zones performed well, the MBR system demonstrated higher removal rates, particularly for nutrient removal. Besides, MBR systems offer several advantages, including reduced excess sludge production and less space requirements compared to A/O process. In general, MBR offers a promising solution for industrial wastewater treatment, with strong potential for application in industrial zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Technology Development Journal - Science of The Earth & Environment
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjsee.v9i1.798
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of conventional biological treatment process and membrane bioreactor treating common industrial effluent

Duc Anh Tuan Le, Vo Thi Kim Quyen, Hoang Thi Tuyet Nhung, Xuan‐Thanh Bui et al.
Science & Technology Development Journal - Science of The Earth & Environment
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

Performance comparison of conventional biological treatment process and membrane bioreactor treating common industrial effluent

Duc Anh Tuan Le, Vo Thi Kim Quyen, Hoang Thi Tuyet Nhung, Xuan‐Thanh Bui, Hoang Quang Huy, Tran Cong Sac, Nguyễn Phương Thảo, Pham Mai Duy Thong, Nguyen Thi Yen Phuong, Hoang Mai Nhu, Tran Pham Yen Nhi
article en

Abstract

Industrial effluent is challenging for wastewater treatment plants due to its complexity, toxicity and variable composition. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of industrial wastewater treatment between a lab-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a full-scale anoxic/oxic (A/O) process. The wastewater used was after primary sedimentation tank, which involved lime or ferric coagulant. The results showed that the treated water quality from both systems was satisfied the national effluent standard for wastewater (column B of QCVN 40-MT:2011/BTNMT). The effluent from A/O process contained 74 ± 11 mg/L of COD, 8.3 ± 1.9 mg/L of TN, 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/L of TP, and 201± 38 Pt-Co of color. Meanwhile, the concentrations of COD, TN, TP, and color in the effluent of MBR system were 88 ± 21, 23.2 ± 4.6, 0.3 ± 0.2 mg/L, and 220 ± 98 Pt-Co, respectively. The removal rates of COD, TN, TP and color of anoxic/oxic process were 234 ± 119, 16 ± 3, 0.3 ± 0.2 mg/L.day, 213 ± 58 Pt-Co/L.day, respectively. The removal rates of COD, TN, TP, and color in MBR system were 1.6, 1.3, 10.3, and 2.1 times higher than those in the A/O process, respectively. Although the A/O process in industrial zones performed well, the MBR system demonstrated higher removal rates, particularly for nutrient removal. Besides, MBR systems offer several advantages, including reduced excess sludge production and less space requirements compared to A/O process. In general, MBR offers a promising solution for industrial wastewater treatment, with strong potential for application in industrial zones.

Science & Technology Development Journal - Science of The Earth & Environment
Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.