An Exploration of the Cannabusiness in Michigan and the Influence of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 26 U.S. Code § 280E

Michigan cannabusiness owners face a number of industry-specific limitations and difficulties despite Michigan’s legalization of recreational adult-use marijuana in 2018. Michigan marijuana related business (MRB) owners battle repercussions resulting from the federally enacted Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Cannabis is outlawed federally, thereby making participation in the industry illegal and susceptible to federal prosecution. The CSA led to the creation of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 280E; a legislation preventing MRBs from deducting all business expenses. IRC Section 280E negatively affects cannabusinesses by disallowing them from using their net income in computing their business tax liability. Cannabis’s designation as a Schedule I illicit substance in the CSA also prevents cannabusinesses from seeking sufficient access to business financing through debt and equity. Despite Michigan’s cannabis industry spawning healthy revenues, the impediment imposed by IRC Section 280E leaves all U.S. MRBs artificially stunted. Cannabis as a product is discussed, as well as its history in the U.S. and in Michigan. Relevant literature and proposed solutions for the U.S. cannabis industry are evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Business Institute Journal
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.138362
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wine Industry and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploration of the Cannabusiness in Michigan and the Influence of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 26 U.S. Code § 280E

Stacy Boyer-Davis, Мінас Рамзесович Аракелян, H.N. Hart
1 citations
Small Business Institute Journal
Wine Industry and Tourism
3.56
article

An Exploration of the Cannabusiness in Michigan and the Influence of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 26 U.S. Code § 280E

Stacy Boyer-Davis, Мінас Рамзесович Аракелян, H.N. Hart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Michigan cannabusiness owners face a number of industry-specific limitations and difficulties despite Michigan’s legalization of recreational adult-use marijuana in 2018. Michigan marijuana related business (MRB) owners battle repercussions resulting from the federally enacted Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Cannabis is outlawed federally, thereby making participation in the industry illegal and susceptible to federal prosecution. The CSA led to the creation of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 280E; a legislation preventing MRBs from deducting all business expenses. IRC Section 280E negatively affects cannabusinesses by disallowing them from using their net income in computing their business tax liability. Cannabis’s designation as a Schedule I illicit substance in the CSA also prevents cannabusinesses from seeking sufficient access to business financing through debt and equity. Despite Michigan’s cannabis industry spawning healthy revenues, the impediment imposed by IRC Section 280E leaves all U.S. MRBs artificially stunted. Cannabis as a product is discussed, as well as its history in the U.S. and in Michigan. Relevant literature and proposed solutions for the U.S. cannabis industry are evaluated.

Small Business Institute JournalVol. 21(1)
Northern Michigan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Wine Industry and Tourism
3.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.