From lexicon to phrase: Behavioral evidence for a dynamic cognitive mechanism underlying language control

This study examined language control at both lexical and phrasal levels, and their relationships with general cognitive control. Thirty-three participants completed two picture-naming tasks assessing lexical and phrasal control. We measured mixing costs (i.e., the index of proactive language control) and switch costs (i.e., the index of reactive language control), and examined their relationships with general proactive cognitive control, assessed by the Proactive Behavioral Index (PBI) from the AX-CPT task, and with general reactive cognitive control, assessed by Stroop scores from the Stroop task. Results revealed greater L1 than L2 mixing costs at both linguistic levels. Switch costs were symmetrical at the lexical level but asymmetrical at the phrasal level. PBI predicted mixing costs at both linguistic levels, whereas Stroop scores predicted switch costs only at the phrasal level. These findings suggest that bilinguals rely on proactive control to monitor bilingual lexical competition, whereas both proactive and reactive control are engaged at the phrasal level. This study proposes a hypothesis that control demands vary across linguistic levels, influencing the adaptation of language control mechanisms and their relationships with general cognitive control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105277
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From lexicon to phrase: Behavioral evidence for a dynamic cognitive mechanism underlying language control

Junjie Wu, Qiping Wang, Qingwei Xue, Luyao Chen
1 citations
Acta Psychologica
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
article

From lexicon to phrase: Behavioral evidence for a dynamic cognitive mechanism underlying language control

Junjie Wu, Qiping Wang, Qingwei Xue, Luyao Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examined language control at both lexical and phrasal levels, and their relationships with general cognitive control. Thirty-three participants completed two picture-naming tasks assessing lexical and phrasal control. We measured mixing costs (i.e., the index of proactive language control) and switch costs (i.e., the index of reactive language control), and examined their relationships with general proactive cognitive control, assessed by the Proactive Behavioral Index (PBI) from the AX-CPT task, and with general reactive cognitive control, assessed by Stroop scores from the Stroop task. Results revealed greater L1 than L2 mixing costs at both linguistic levels. Switch costs were symmetrical at the lexical level but asymmetrical at the phrasal level. PBI predicted mixing costs at both linguistic levels, whereas Stroop scores predicted switch costs only at the phrasal level. These findings suggest that bilinguals rely on proactive control to monitor bilingual lexical competition, whereas both proactive and reactive control are engaged at the phrasal level. This study proposes a hypothesis that control demands vary across linguistic levels, influencing the adaptation of language control mechanisms and their relationships with general cognitive control.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 258
Tianjin Normal University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.