Waste-to-energy pathways for fresh and legacy waste management: A case study in India

• LFGR and RDF gasification combined significantly outperform the existing system • RDF gasification scenario recovers 2.2 times more net energy than RDF incineration. • 1 tonne CO2 reduction cost for LFGR is 20 USD, and for gasification case is 32 USD. • Net electricity output has a significant impact on the CC impact category. Rapid urbanization and population growth in developing countries like India have led to the dual challenge of managing the fresh municipal solid waste (MSW) and accumulated legacy waste in unregulated landfills. Despite the environmental significance of legacy waste, it is often overlooked in existing life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. This results in a critical gap in integrated LCA approaches that consider both waste streams within a single system boundary. This study addresses this gap by conducting an integrated attributional LCA, using the case study of Ghazipur landfill, Delhi, India. It covers processes from waste collection to energy recovery, using a functional unit of 1 tonne of MSW. LCA is performed using GaBi software and the Environmental Footprint 3. Four scenarios are analyzed: landfill without gas recovery (LF), landfill with gas recovery (LFGR) for fresh waste, refuse-derived fuel (RDF) incineration, and RDF gasification for legacy waste. LFGR shows an energy recovery of 73.04 kWh/tonne of MSW, significantly reducing the environmental impacts compared to LF. For legacy waste, RDF gasification outperforms incineration, showing an energy recovery of 306.1 kWh/tonne of MSW. The reduction cost of 1 tonne of CO 2 is 20 USD for LFGR and 32 USD for the RDF gasification. Sensitivity analysis highlights that the net electricity output predominantly affects the climate change category. This study highlights the potential of WtE for biomining and landfill reclamation, supporting circular economy transitions. The integrated LCA framework is replicable across developing nations with similar landfills, aligning with SDGs 7, 11, and 13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2025-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100472
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waste-to-energy pathways for fresh and legacy waste management: A case study in India

Pratham Arora, Sonal K. Thengane, S.K. Singal, Iram Naaz et al.
2 citations
Energy Nexus
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.99
article

Waste-to-energy pathways for fresh and legacy waste management: A case study in India

Pratham Arora, Sonal K. Thengane, S.K. Singal, Iram Naaz, Gunasekhar Thirumoorthy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• LFGR and RDF gasification combined significantly outperform the existing system • RDF gasification scenario recovers 2.2 times more net energy than RDF incineration. • 1 tonne CO2 reduction cost for LFGR is 20 USD, and for gasification case is 32 USD. • Net electricity output has a significant impact on the CC impact category. Rapid urbanization and population growth in developing countries like India have led to the dual challenge of managing the fresh municipal solid waste (MSW) and accumulated legacy waste in unregulated landfills. Despite the environmental significance of legacy waste, it is often overlooked in existing life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. This results in a critical gap in integrated LCA approaches that consider both waste streams within a single system boundary. This study addresses this gap by conducting an integrated attributional LCA, using the case study of Ghazipur landfill, Delhi, India. It covers processes from waste collection to energy recovery, using a functional unit of 1 tonne of MSW. LCA is performed using GaBi software and the Environmental Footprint 3. Four scenarios are analyzed: landfill without gas recovery (LF), landfill with gas recovery (LFGR) for fresh waste, refuse-derived fuel (RDF) incineration, and RDF gasification for legacy waste. LFGR shows an energy recovery of 73.04 kWh/tonne of MSW, significantly reducing the environmental impacts compared to LF. For legacy waste, RDF gasification outperforms incineration, showing an energy recovery of 306.1 kWh/tonne of MSW. The reduction cost of 1 tonne of CO 2 is 20 USD for LFGR and 32 USD for the RDF gasification. Sensitivity analysis highlights that the net electricity output predominantly affects the climate change category. This study highlights the potential of WtE for biomining and landfill reclamation, supporting circular economy transitions. The integrated LCA framework is replicable across developing nations with similar landfills, aligning with SDGs 7, 11, and 13.

Energy NexusVol. 19
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre (IN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.