Preference-Based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) is a structured approach for optimizing tasks with multiple objectives. However, it often relies on pre-defined reward functions, which can be hard to design for balancing conflicting goals and may lead to oversimplification. Preferences can serve as more flexible and intuitive decision-making guidance, eliminating the need for complicated reward design. This paper introduces preference-based MORL (Pb-MORL), which formalizes the integration of preferences into the MORL framework. We theoretically prove that preferences can derive policies across the entire Pareto frontier. To guide policy optimization using preferences, our method constructs a multi-objective reward model that aligns with the given preferences. We further provide theoretical proof to show that optimizing this reward model is equivalent to training the Pareto optimal policy. Extensive experiments in benchmark multi-objective tasks, a multi-energy management task, and an autonomous driving task on a multi-line highway show that our method performs competitively, surpassing the oracle method, which uses the ground truth reward function. This highlights its potential for practical applications in complex real-world systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2025.3589271
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preference-Based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

Ni Mu, Yao Luan, Qing‐Shan Jia
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
Smart Parking Systems Research
3.02
article

Preference-Based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

Ni Mu, Yao Luan, Qing‐Shan Jia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) is a structured approach for optimizing tasks with multiple objectives. However, it often relies on pre-defined reward functions, which can be hard to design for balancing conflicting goals and may lead to oversimplification. Preferences can serve as more flexible and intuitive decision-making guidance, eliminating the need for complicated reward design. This paper introduces preference-based MORL (Pb-MORL), which formalizes the integration of preferences into the MORL framework. We theoretically prove that preferences can derive policies across the entire Pareto frontier. To guide policy optimization using preferences, our method constructs a multi-objective reward model that aligns with the given preferences. We further provide theoretical proof to show that optimizing this reward model is equivalent to training the Pareto optimal policy. Extensive experiments in benchmark multi-objective tasks, a multi-energy management task, and an autonomous driving task on a multi-line highway show that our method performs competitively, surpassing the oracle method, which uses the ground truth reward function. This highlights its potential for practical applications in complex real-world systems.

IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringVol. 22
Shandong Institute of Automation (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Smart Parking Systems Research
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preference-Based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning — Ni Mu, Yao Luan, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS