TEMPO: Timestep Explanations for Modeling Preferences in Online Preference-Based RL

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning enables non-expert users to train agents through interactive feedback. While preference-based methods (PbRL) have gained popularity by allowing humans to express preferences between trajectory pairs, they are limited by their narrow feedback interface - humans can only indicate which trajectory they prefer but not why. This work introduces a more expressive preference-based learning framework that allows humans to provide step-level explanations alongside their preferences, indicating which specific timesteps influenced their decisions. Our key technical innovation is a training approach that incorporates these explanations using a novel loss function combining reward learning, saliency-based explanations, and structural regularization.We evaluate our method across multiple continuous control environments using both synthetic oracles and human trainers. Results show that our approach accelerates learning compared to standard preference-based methods while maintaining robustness across different types of human feedback patterns. The improved learning speed and more natural interaction suggest that this is a promising direction for making human-in-the-loop RL more practical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3588936
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TEMPO: Timestep Explanations for Modeling Preferences in Online Preference-Based RL

Friedhelm Schwenker, Jakob Karlaus
IEEE Access
Data Management and Algorithms
article

TEMPO: Timestep Explanations for Modeling Preferences in Online Preference-Based RL

Friedhelm Schwenker, Jakob Karlaus
article en

Abstract

Human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning enables non-expert users to train agents through interactive feedback. While preference-based methods (PbRL) have gained popularity by allowing humans to express preferences between trajectory pairs, they are limited by their narrow feedback interface - humans can only indicate which trajectory they prefer but not why. This work introduces a more expressive preference-based learning framework that allows humans to provide step-level explanations alongside their preferences, indicating which specific timesteps influenced their decisions. Our key technical innovation is a training approach that incorporates these explanations using a novel loss function combining reward learning, saliency-based explanations, and structural regularization.We evaluate our method across multiple continuous control environments using both synthetic oracles and human trainers. Results show that our approach accelerates learning compared to standard preference-based methods while maintaining robustness across different types of human feedback patterns. The improved learning speed and more natural interaction suggest that this is a promising direction for making human-in-the-loop RL more practical.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Universität Ulm (DE), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Data Management and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.