Sheath Voltage Limiter Defects Detection Method Based on Harmonic Phasor Differences of Sheath Current for Cross-Bonded HV Cable

The sheath voltage limiter (SVL) defect is a typical defect in HV cable cross-bonding systems that threatens cable system safety. Traditional surge arrester detection and time-domain sheath current analysis methods fail to accurately identify SVL defects due to environmental complexities and parameter variations. This paper proposes a defect diagnosis method based on harmonic phasor difference of sheath currents. By establishing a frequency-domain equivalent model of cross-bonded HV cables combined with SVL nonlinear resistance characteristics, harmonic currents under defect conditions are treated as harmonic sources injected into the sheath loop. Transfer functions analyze the impacts of SVL defects on sheath currents, revealing that harmonic content during SVL defects is significantly higher than under normal conditions and other defect types. Through simulation analysis using 110kV cable as the case study, diagnostic criteria based on harmonic content of sheath current phasor differences were established: When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 1, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.88%~21.31%, 0.79%~8.98%, 0.17%~1.94%, and 0.11%~1.10% respectively; When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 2, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.30%~23.71%, 0.55%~9.99%, 0.12%~2.16%, and 0.07%~1.22% respectively; When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 3, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.53%~16.15%, 0.65%~6.81%, 0.14%~1.47%, and 0.08%~0.83% respectively. The harmonic content of phasor differences is significantly affected by ground impedance and phase currents, while the influence of phase voltage is insignificant. Compared with existing methods, this approach takes into account the effects of complex environmental factors and effectively resolves the issue of traditional diagnostic methods being unable to distinguish between SVL defects and other types of grounding defects, thereby improving the accuracy of SVL defect diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3587895
Primary Topic
Power Line Inspection Robots
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sheath Voltage Limiter Defects Detection Method Based on Harmonic Phasor Differences of Sheath Current for Cross-Bonded HV Cable

Zhi Li, Zhengkai Tu, Rui Song, F. Liu et al.
IEEE Access
Power Line Inspection Robots
article

Sheath Voltage Limiter Defects Detection Method Based on Harmonic Phasor Differences of Sheath Current for Cross-Bonded HV Cable

Zhi Li, Zhengkai Tu, Rui Song, F. Liu, Xinyun Gao, Zhanran Xia, Hang Wang, Hao Hu, Bin Yang, Yongheng Ai
article en

Abstract

The sheath voltage limiter (SVL) defect is a typical defect in HV cable cross-bonding systems that threatens cable system safety. Traditional surge arrester detection and time-domain sheath current analysis methods fail to accurately identify SVL defects due to environmental complexities and parameter variations. This paper proposes a defect diagnosis method based on harmonic phasor difference of sheath currents. By establishing a frequency-domain equivalent model of cross-bonded HV cables combined with SVL nonlinear resistance characteristics, harmonic currents under defect conditions are treated as harmonic sources injected into the sheath loop. Transfer functions analyze the impacts of SVL defects on sheath currents, revealing that harmonic content during SVL defects is significantly higher than under normal conditions and other defect types. Through simulation analysis using 110kV cable as the case study, diagnostic criteria based on harmonic content of sheath current phasor differences were established: When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 1, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.88%~21.31%, 0.79%~8.98%, 0.17%~1.94%, and 0.11%~1.10% respectively; When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 2, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.30%~23.71%, 0.55%~9.99%, 0.12%~2.16%, and 0.07%~1.22% respectively; When SVL defects occur in sheath loop 3, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 9th harmonic content variation ranges of the head-to-tail sheath current phasor difference in this loop are 1.53%~16.15%, 0.65%~6.81%, 0.14%~1.47%, and 0.08%~0.83% respectively. The harmonic content of phasor differences is significantly affected by ground impedance and phase currents, while the influence of phase voltage is insignificant. Compared with existing methods, this approach takes into account the effects of complex environmental factors and effectively resolves the issue of traditional diagnostic methods being unable to distinguish between SVL defects and other types of grounding defects, thereby improving the accuracy of SVL defect diagnosis.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN), Economic Research Institute (BG), Hubei University of Technology (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Power Line Inspection Robots
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.