Computational fluid dynamic analysis in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm for surveillance of aneurysm potential rupture

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to identify the morphology of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and analyze wall shear stress and wall pressure using computational fluid dynamic analysis to predict potential rupture areas. <h3>Methods</h3> A cross-sectional study was conducted on infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm patients at the Vascular and Endovascular Division, Department of Surgery, and the Department of Radiology, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, from July to December 2022. Three-dimensional models were reconstructed from computed tomography angiograms and infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were classified into five morphological types. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was performed to generate wall shear stress and wall pressure contours at varying blood pressure and velocity. Visual results for each type were analyzed and compared. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 25.0. <h3>Results</h3> From 93 computed tomography angiograms, 40 samples met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five percent of samples had a saccular component. Visual analysis showed a correlation between areas of lowest wall shear stress and highest wall pressure. Velocity and blood pressure also affected wall shear stress and wall pressure; however, the center of the contour as potential prediction rupture sites remained consistent. Significant differences were found in wall shear stress and wall pressure (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Areas of lowest wall shear stress correspond with highest wall pressure, indicating potential rupture sites. Blood velocity and pressure changes also influenced wall shear stress and wall pressure. Surveillance should be subjected to closer inspection on areas with lowet wall shear stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JVS-Vascular Insights
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsvi.2025.100267
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational fluid dynamic analysis in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm for surveillance of aneurysm potential rupture

Reyhan Eddy Yunus, Muhammad Ilyas, Nyityasmono Tri Nugroho, Raden Suhartono et al.
1 links
JVS-Vascular Insights
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Computational fluid dynamic analysis in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm for surveillance of aneurysm potential rupture

Reyhan Eddy Yunus, Muhammad Ilyas, Nyityasmono Tri Nugroho, Raden Suhartono, Agus Prasetyo Nuryadi, Muhammad Hanif Nadhif
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> This study aims to identify the morphology of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and analyze wall shear stress and wall pressure using computational fluid dynamic analysis to predict potential rupture areas. <h3>Methods</h3> A cross-sectional study was conducted on infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm patients at the Vascular and Endovascular Division, Department of Surgery, and the Department of Radiology, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, from July to December 2022. Three-dimensional models were reconstructed from computed tomography angiograms and infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were classified into five morphological types. Computational fluid dynamic analysis was performed to generate wall shear stress and wall pressure contours at varying blood pressure and velocity. Visual results for each type were analyzed and compared. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 25.0. <h3>Results</h3> From 93 computed tomography angiograms, 40 samples met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five percent of samples had a saccular component. Visual analysis showed a correlation between areas of lowest wall shear stress and highest wall pressure. Velocity and blood pressure also affected wall shear stress and wall pressure; however, the center of the contour as potential prediction rupture sites remained consistent. Significant differences were found in wall shear stress and wall pressure (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Areas of lowest wall shear stress correspond with highest wall pressure, indicating potential rupture sites. Blood velocity and pressure changes also influenced wall shear stress and wall pressure. Surveillance should be subjected to closer inspection on areas with lowet wall shear stress.

JVS-Vascular InsightsVol. 3
University of Indonesia (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.