Written patient resources for complex endovascular aneurysm repair and challenging to read and understand

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> Health literacy is a critical mediator of cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes<sup>1–3</sup>. Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (cEVAR) represents a challenging subject for providers to describe and for patients to understand. There have been no studies examining readability or understandability of patient-facing resources for cEVAR. In Canada, 49% of adults have a reading level below grade 12<sup>4</sup>. The 2024 United States National literacy Institute assessment reported a 21% illiteracy rate, with 54% of Americans reading below 6<sup>th</sup> grade<sup>5</sup>. This provides a rationale for the recommendation of the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association, that patient-facing educational resources fall below a 6<sup>th</sup> grade reading level. <h3>Objective</h3> We hypothesized that the readability and understandability of patient-facing resources on cEVAR would exceed the national reading level of Canadians and Americans. <h3>Methods</h3> Two common electronic search engines were used to find patient-facing resources pertaining to cEVAR, resulting in 55 non-redundant resources. Plain text copies of each resource were assessed using the common readability indices Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and their understandability analyzed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and PEMAT-Audiovisual Tool (PEMAT-AV). <h3>Results</h3> The FKGL generated a mean reading grade level of 9.3 ± 2.61, and SMOG generated a mean reading grade level of 11.9 ± 2.0. The mean PEMAT understandability percentage was 54.2 ± 19.0. By SMOG analysis, 45% of the resources (or 25 of 55 resources) required a grade 12 education. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Every resource examined was above the grade level recommendations of the CDC/NIH/AHA/AHRQ/AMA. On average, only 54% of any resource content was understandable. Limitations include the assumption that (1), health resources with appropriate literacy levels will generate changes in behaviour/outcomes of for patients with aneurysm disease, and (2) there is likely variable health literacy in the AAA patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JVS-Vascular Insights
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsvi.2025.100270
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Written patient resources for complex endovascular aneurysm repair and challenging to read and understand

Miranda Witheford, Caryn Dooner
JVS-Vascular Insights
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

Written patient resources for complex endovascular aneurysm repair and challenging to read and understand

Miranda Witheford, Caryn Dooner
article en

Abstract

<h2>ABSTRACT</h2><h3>Background</h3> Health literacy is a critical mediator of cardiovascular risk factor control and outcomes<sup>1–3</sup>. Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (cEVAR) represents a challenging subject for providers to describe and for patients to understand. There have been no studies examining readability or understandability of patient-facing resources for cEVAR. In Canada, 49% of adults have a reading level below grade 12<sup>4</sup>. The 2024 United States National literacy Institute assessment reported a 21% illiteracy rate, with 54% of Americans reading below 6<sup>th</sup> grade<sup>5</sup>. This provides a rationale for the recommendation of the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association, that patient-facing educational resources fall below a 6<sup>th</sup> grade reading level. <h3>Objective</h3> We hypothesized that the readability and understandability of patient-facing resources on cEVAR would exceed the national reading level of Canadians and Americans. <h3>Methods</h3> Two common electronic search engines were used to find patient-facing resources pertaining to cEVAR, resulting in 55 non-redundant resources. Plain text copies of each resource were assessed using the common readability indices Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Simple Measures of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and their understandability analyzed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and PEMAT-Audiovisual Tool (PEMAT-AV). <h3>Results</h3> The FKGL generated a mean reading grade level of 9.3 ± 2.61, and SMOG generated a mean reading grade level of 11.9 ± 2.0. The mean PEMAT understandability percentage was 54.2 ± 19.0. By SMOG analysis, 45% of the resources (or 25 of 55 resources) required a grade 12 education. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Every resource examined was above the grade level recommendations of the CDC/NIH/AHA/AHRQ/AMA. On average, only 54% of any resource content was understandable. Limitations include the assumption that (1), health resources with appropriate literacy levels will generate changes in behaviour/outcomes of for patients with aneurysm disease, and (2) there is likely variable health literacy in the AAA patient population.

JVS-Vascular InsightsVol. 3
University of Toronto (CA), Kingston General Hospital (CA), Toronto General Hospital (CA)
University Health Network
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.