Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study

GTN model is among the best models that simulate crack growth at the microscopic level. Estimating crack propagation is vitally important to ensure an effective operation of different equipment and avoid breakdowns, especially in the field of nuclear energy. However, the GTN parameters determination is a complicated process that requires much time and analysis. Several studies have dealt with this problem and tried different methods to determine GTN parameters, some examples being the direct method, and the backpropagation method. My main objective in this work was to do a quantitative comparison among the direct method and the backpropagation approach and to find out the best and the method which is fully optimized for the GTN parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Structural Integrity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.06.059
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study

Szabolcs Szávai, Yassine Chahboub
1 links
Procedia Structural Integrity
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study

Szabolcs Szávai, Yassine Chahboub
article en

Abstract

GTN model is among the best models that simulate crack growth at the microscopic level. Estimating crack propagation is vitally important to ensure an effective operation of different equipment and avoid breakdowns, especially in the field of nuclear energy. However, the GTN parameters determination is a complicated process that requires much time and analysis. Several studies have dealt with this problem and tried different methods to determine GTN parameters, some examples being the direct method, and the backpropagation method. My main objective in this work was to do a quantitative comparison among the direct method and the backpropagation approach and to find out the best and the method which is fully optimized for the GTN parameters.

Procedia Structural IntegrityVol. 68
Bay Zoltán Foundation for Applied Research (HU), University of Dunaújváros (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Direct Method and Backpropagation method in Determining GTN Parameters: A Quantitative Study — Szabolcs Szávai, Yassine Chahboub · Procedia Structural Integrity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS