COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN THE TASK OF ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES: ACCURACY, INTERPRETABILITY, AND PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY

Modern machine learning models are increasingly used in financial analysis, particularly in assessing the stability of enterprises. The purpose of this article is to compare logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural network models in terms of predictive accuracy, interpretability, and practical applicability in evaluating corporate financial stability. The methodological framework includes a theoretical overview of models, comparison across key criteria (data requirements, noise robustness, explainability), and identification of conditions under which each algorithm is most effective. The study emphasizes that model accuracy must be balanced with transparency and usability for decisionmaking. Based on the findings, the article offers recommendations on model selection depending on the objectives of analysis, data quality, and the analytical maturity of the organization. A phased and hybrid implementation of intelligent risk assessment systems is proposed as a strategic approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SOFT MEASUREMENTS AND COMPUTING
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36871/2618-9976.2025.06.009
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN THE TASK OF ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES: ACCURACY, INTERPRETABILITY, AND PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY

A. Pozdnyakov
SOFT MEASUREMENTS AND COMPUTING
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN THE TASK OF ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES: ACCURACY, INTERPRETABILITY, AND PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY

A. Pozdnyakov
article en

Abstract

Modern machine learning models are increasingly used in financial analysis, particularly in assessing the stability of enterprises. The purpose of this article is to compare logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural network models in terms of predictive accuracy, interpretability, and practical applicability in evaluating corporate financial stability. The methodological framework includes a theoretical overview of models, comparison across key criteria (data requirements, noise robustness, explainability), and identification of conditions under which each algorithm is most effective. The study emphasizes that model accuracy must be balanced with transparency and usability for decisionmaking. Based on the findings, the article offers recommendations on model selection depending on the objectives of analysis, data quality, and the analytical maturity of the organization. A phased and hybrid implementation of intelligent risk assessment systems is proposed as a strategic approach.

SOFT MEASUREMENTS AND COMPUTINGVol. 6(91)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Economic and Technological Developments in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS IN THE TASK OF ASSESSING THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES: ACCURACY, INTERPRETABILITY, AND PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY — A. Pozdnyakov · SOFT MEASUREMENTS AND COMPUTING (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS