Comparison of Local Anesthetic Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine at Different Buccal Cortical Bone Thicknesses during Mandibular Molar Implant Surgery

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of local infiltration anesthesia using lidocaine and articaine during mandibular molar implant surgery with different buccal cortical bone thicknesses (1 mm, 1–2 mm, 2 mm), to provide scientific evidence for the clinical selection of anesthetic agents. Methods: The study subjects were 240 adult patients who underwent mandibular molar implant surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University between May 2023 and May 2024. The thickness of the buccal cortical bone was confirmed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and patients were randomly divided into three groups: the first group (cortical bone thickness 1 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients); the second group (cortical bone thickness 1–2 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients); and the third group (cortical bone thickness 2 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients). The primary outcomes measured were onset time of anesthesia (seconds) and anesthesia efficacy rate (percentage). Results: In the first group, the onset time of anesthesia in the lidocaine group and articaine group was 45.2 ± 5.32 seconds and 44.80 ± 4.60 seconds, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.720). The overall efficacy rates were 95.0% and 97.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.556). In the second group, the onset time of anesthesia was significantly longer in the lidocaine group than in the articaine group (56.70 ± 6.05 seconds vs. 50.35 ± 5.66 seconds, p < 0.05), and the overall efficacy rate was lower (80.0% vs. 95.0%, p < 0.05). In the third group, the onset time of anesthesia was significantly prolonged in the lidocaine group (65.4 ± 6.68 seconds) compared to the articaine group (52.25 ± 5.80 seconds, p < 0.01), and the overall efficacy rate was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (79.0% vs. 90.0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in anesthetic efficacy between lidocaine and articaine when the buccal cortical bone thickness is 1 mm. However, when the buccal cortical bone thickness is 1–2 mm or 2 mm, articaine demonstrates a faster onset time and higher anesthetic efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Precision Medicine
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18063/apm.v10i2.891
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Local Anesthetic Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine at Different Buccal Cortical Bone Thicknesses during Mandibular Molar Implant Surgery

Xin-chun Jian, Dong Wu, Xiaoning He
1 links
Advances in Precision Medicine
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
article

Comparison of Local Anesthetic Effects of Lidocaine and Articaine at Different Buccal Cortical Bone Thicknesses during Mandibular Molar Implant Surgery

Xin-chun Jian, Dong Wu, Xiaoning He
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of local infiltration anesthesia using lidocaine and articaine during mandibular molar implant surgery with different buccal cortical bone thicknesses (1 mm, 1–2 mm, 2 mm), to provide scientific evidence for the clinical selection of anesthetic agents. Methods: The study subjects were 240 adult patients who underwent mandibular molar implant surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University between May 2023 and May 2024. The thickness of the buccal cortical bone was confirmed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and patients were randomly divided into three groups: the first group (cortical bone thickness 1 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients); the second group (cortical bone thickness 1–2 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients); and the third group (cortical bone thickness 2 mm), study group (lidocaine, 40 patients) and control group (articaine, 40 patients). The primary outcomes measured were onset time of anesthesia (seconds) and anesthesia efficacy rate (percentage). Results: In the first group, the onset time of anesthesia in the lidocaine group and articaine group was 45.2 ± 5.32 seconds and 44.80 ± 4.60 seconds, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.720). The overall efficacy rates were 95.0% and 97.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.556). In the second group, the onset time of anesthesia was significantly longer in the lidocaine group than in the articaine group (56.70 ± 6.05 seconds vs. 50.35 ± 5.66 seconds, p < 0.05), and the overall efficacy rate was lower (80.0% vs. 95.0%, p < 0.05). In the third group, the onset time of anesthesia was significantly prolonged in the lidocaine group (65.4 ± 6.68 seconds) compared to the articaine group (52.25 ± 5.80 seconds, p < 0.01), and the overall efficacy rate was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (79.0% vs. 90.0%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in anesthetic efficacy between lidocaine and articaine when the buccal cortical bone thickness is 1 mm. However, when the buccal cortical bone thickness is 1–2 mm or 2 mm, articaine demonstrates a faster onset time and higher anesthetic efficacy.

Advances in Precision MedicineVol. 10(2)
Hainan Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.