A Guide to Inter-Indigenous Co-Labbing

Northern Plains inter-Indigenous relations have been affected by racist, gendered, heteronormative colonial laws, policies, fantasies, discourses, and geopolitical borders. American and Canadian settler statecraft apparatuses, which include federal statutes and acts, have worked to codify Indigenous peoples into “monoethnic identities” (Vrooman 2012, 15) as grounds for defining indigeneity, questioning legitimacy, managing populations, severing relationalities, stealing lands and resources, and mitigating Indigenous resistances. While Nêhiyaw scholar Rob Alexander Innes and settler scholar Nicholas P. Vrooman argue that the Iron Alliance—an economic, military and social confederacy comprising Northern Plains Nêhiyaw, Nakoda, Métis, and Anishinaabe multicultural bands (Innes 2021, 94) active from the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries—has been broadly “overlooked by US scholars” (Vrooman 2012, 6), we affirm that Indigenous women and gender-diverse voices have been historically unheard and unseen between the lines of published Iron Alliance historiographies. Our research seeks to activate gendered inter-Indigenous networks, to reconceptualize critical borderland studies, and to situate place (in particular, Winnipeg) as a constellation of kinscapes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Indian Culture and Research Journal
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17953/a3.20289
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Guide to Inter-Indigenous Co-Labbing

Mylène Yannick Gamache, A. E. D. Daniels, Hope Ace, Adrienne Huard et al.
American Indian Culture and Research Journal
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

A Guide to Inter-Indigenous Co-Labbing

Mylène Yannick Gamache, A. E. D. Daniels, Hope Ace, Adrienne Huard, Nicole Stonyk
article en

Abstract

Northern Plains inter-Indigenous relations have been affected by racist, gendered, heteronormative colonial laws, policies, fantasies, discourses, and geopolitical borders. American and Canadian settler statecraft apparatuses, which include federal statutes and acts, have worked to codify Indigenous peoples into “monoethnic identities” (Vrooman 2012, 15) as grounds for defining indigeneity, questioning legitimacy, managing populations, severing relationalities, stealing lands and resources, and mitigating Indigenous resistances. While Nêhiyaw scholar Rob Alexander Innes and settler scholar Nicholas P. Vrooman argue that the Iron Alliance—an economic, military and social confederacy comprising Northern Plains Nêhiyaw, Nakoda, Métis, and Anishinaabe multicultural bands (Innes 2021, 94) active from the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries—has been broadly “overlooked by US scholars” (Vrooman 2012, 6), we affirm that Indigenous women and gender-diverse voices have been historically unheard and unseen between the lines of published Iron Alliance historiographies. Our research seeks to activate gendered inter-Indigenous networks, to reconceptualize critical borderland studies, and to situate place (in particular, Winnipeg) as a constellation of kinscapes.

American Indian Culture and Research JournalVol. 48(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.