‘Floating Populations’ of Seabirds: The Bane of Demographic Modelers and Managers

’Floating’ portions of seabird populations (mature but non-breeding individuals) are generally ignored in seabird research and management despite frequent evidence of their existence, especially in cavity-nesting species for whom nest habitat is often limiting. Here we demonstrate, using a few among an appreciable number of cases, that often more adults contribute to regional populations than colony-based censuses reveal, and that these birds are able to breed but do not. Once given the chance through the creation of nesting habitat, either by natural or human-caused processes, these populations reveal themselves by occupying the newly created habitats to become breeders. We include a brief discussion of the degree to which natal philopatry contributes to relatively sudden colony establishment. Not recognizing the existence of floating populations due to exclusively colony-based management, which is often politically necessary (e.g., Wildlife Refuge management), hinders conservation because it ignores the source and role of potential immigrants. Instead, management tends to emphasize supposed natal philopatry. Floaters will exploit mortality-caused vacancies in a breeding population, masking temporal variation in adult mortality, falsely indicating colony-size stability as a measure of the ‘health’ or resilience of a colony/habitat. In addition, the most successful efforts at establishing new colonies or restoring others by ‘social attraction’ are those in which a floating population is present, although unrecognized until it is revealed by the social attraction ‘experiment.’ Success comes when the artificially established breeding aggregation becomes an attractant to ‘floaters.’ Thus, recruitment of these floaters (especially on a predator-free colony or island) accelerates the limited growth provided by the return of hand-raised translocated nestlings. A lack of appreciation for the presence of floaters also limits the validity of assessments of the impact of bird wrecks and the ability of populations to recover from them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine ornithology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.52.2.1589
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Floating Populations’ of Seabirds: The Bane of Demographic Modelers and Managers

Pat Baird, David G. Ainley, George J. Divoky, Gregory Spencer
4 citations
Marine ornithology
Avian ecology and behavior
1.84
article

‘Floating Populations’ of Seabirds: The Bane of Demographic Modelers and Managers

Pat Baird, David G. Ainley, George J. Divoky, Gregory Spencer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

’Floating’ portions of seabird populations (mature but non-breeding individuals) are generally ignored in seabird research and management despite frequent evidence of their existence, especially in cavity-nesting species for whom nest habitat is often limiting. Here we demonstrate, using a few among an appreciable number of cases, that often more adults contribute to regional populations than colony-based censuses reveal, and that these birds are able to breed but do not. Once given the chance through the creation of nesting habitat, either by natural or human-caused processes, these populations reveal themselves by occupying the newly created habitats to become breeders. We include a brief discussion of the degree to which natal philopatry contributes to relatively sudden colony establishment. Not recognizing the existence of floating populations due to exclusively colony-based management, which is often politically necessary (e.g., Wildlife Refuge management), hinders conservation because it ignores the source and role of potential immigrants. Instead, management tends to emphasize supposed natal philopatry. Floaters will exploit mortality-caused vacancies in a breeding population, masking temporal variation in adult mortality, falsely indicating colony-size stability as a measure of the ‘health’ or resilience of a colony/habitat. In addition, the most successful efforts at establishing new colonies or restoring others by ‘social attraction’ are those in which a floating population is present, although unrecognized until it is revealed by the social attraction ‘experiment.’ Success comes when the artificially established breeding aggregation becomes an attractant to ‘floaters.’ Thus, recruitment of these floaters (especially on a predator-free colony or island) accelerates the limited growth provided by the return of hand-raised translocated nestlings. A lack of appreciation for the presence of floaters also limits the validity of assessments of the impact of bird wrecks and the ability of populations to recover from them.

Marine ornithologyVol. 52(2)
H.T. Harvey & Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Avian ecology and behavior
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.