Evaluating the Impact of Battery Storage Capacity on Energy Flexibility in Buildings

Due to the exhaustion and environmental pollution caused by fossil resources, the share of renewable resources in the energy portfolio continuously increases. Two of the main renewable resources, including photovoltaic and wind, are highly dependent on weather conditions, which leads to increased uncertainty in generation. As a result, the need for different types of flexibility, especially energy flexibility, in energy systems is increasing. One of the important sources of energy flexibility is energy storage systems. In this paper, the effect of different capacities of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) and different photovoltaic capacities on the energy flexibility of a smart building is investigated. To achieve this, changes in the self-consumption index (SC) for different capacities of photovoltaic systems and BESS are analyzed. PV capacities of 165,330, and 495 kW are chosen. which generated <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$28.5 \%, 57 \%$</tex>, and 85 % of the building's cumulative energy consumption during one year, respectively. The results show that as the difference between generation and consumption increases, the addition of the same BESS capacity leads to a greater increase in the SC. Adding BESS with 100 % and 200 % PV capacity at 495 kW PV capacity resulted in SC improvement of 15 % and 7 %, respectively. Adding the same percentage of BESS at 330 kW PV capacity resulted in about 9 % and 2 % improvement in SC. While in the PV capacity of 165 kW, the amount of changes of SC was around 2 % and less than 1 %.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictem66196.2025.11063625
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of Battery Storage Capacity on Energy Flexibility in Buildings

Hossein Gharibvand, Gevork B. Gharehpetian, Amjad Anvari‐Moghaddam
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Evaluating the Impact of Battery Storage Capacity on Energy Flexibility in Buildings

Hossein Gharibvand, Gevork B. Gharehpetian, Amjad Anvari‐Moghaddam
article en

Abstract

Due to the exhaustion and environmental pollution caused by fossil resources, the share of renewable resources in the energy portfolio continuously increases. Two of the main renewable resources, including photovoltaic and wind, are highly dependent on weather conditions, which leads to increased uncertainty in generation. As a result, the need for different types of flexibility, especially energy flexibility, in energy systems is increasing. One of the important sources of energy flexibility is energy storage systems. In this paper, the effect of different capacities of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) and different photovoltaic capacities on the energy flexibility of a smart building is investigated. To achieve this, changes in the self-consumption index (SC) for different capacities of photovoltaic systems and BESS are analyzed. PV capacities of 165,330, and 495 kW are chosen. which generated <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$28.5 \%, 57 \%$</tex>, and 85 % of the building's cumulative energy consumption during one year, respectively. The results show that as the difference between generation and consumption increases, the addition of the same BESS capacity leads to a greater increase in the SC. Adding BESS with 100 % and 200 % PV capacity at 495 kW PV capacity resulted in SC improvement of 15 % and 7 %, respectively. Adding the same percentage of BESS at 330 kW PV capacity resulted in about 9 % and 2 % improvement in SC. While in the PV capacity of 165 kW, the amount of changes of SC was around 2 % and less than 1 %.

Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Aalborg University (DK)
National Science Foundation, Iran National Science Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.