THUCYDIDES ON THE CHANGE IN THE RELATION BETWEEN NAMES AND THINGS (3.82–83)

This paper discusses Thucydides' passage on the notorious change in the use of language during the civil strife in the course of the Peloponnesian War.The author argues that today's prevailing interpretation of the crucial sentence (3.82.4) and the ensuing part of the text as referring only to moral revaluation of certain actions and human properties, but not to the change in their primary linguistic designations (J.Wilson, 1980), is incorrect.Also, the earlier understanding of the sentence as pointing to the change in the meaning of the words is not right, if one has in view what is today called 'dictionary meaning'.The debatable sentence should be understood rather as renaming certain actions and human properties, a process in which the dictionary meaning of a word and its connotations are intact, but the understanding of things (referents) and their evaluation has changed, and the things accordingly receive designations corresponding to these new views.This mode of viewing moral degradation occurs after Thucydides in such texts as Plat.Rep. VIII.560 d -e, and some others.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp2306901529020
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THUCYDIDES ON THE CHANGE IN THE RELATION BETWEEN NAMES AND THINGS (3.82–83)

Alexander Verlinsky
Indo-European linguistics and classical philology
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

THUCYDIDES ON THE CHANGE IN THE RELATION BETWEEN NAMES AND THINGS (3.82–83)

Alexander Verlinsky
article en

Abstract

This paper discusses Thucydides' passage on the notorious change in the use of language during the civil strife in the course of the Peloponnesian War.The author argues that today's prevailing interpretation of the crucial sentence (3.82.4) and the ensuing part of the text as referring only to moral revaluation of certain actions and human properties, but not to the change in their primary linguistic designations (J.Wilson, 1980), is incorrect.Also, the earlier understanding of the sentence as pointing to the change in the meaning of the words is not right, if one has in view what is today called 'dictionary meaning'.The debatable sentence should be understood rather as renaming certain actions and human properties, a process in which the dictionary meaning of a word and its connotations are intact, but the understanding of things (referents) and their evaluation has changed, and the things accordingly receive designations corresponding to these new views.This mode of viewing moral degradation occurs after Thucydides in such texts as Plat.Rep. VIII.560 d -e, and some others.

Indo-European linguistics and classical philologyVol. 29
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.