Mongolian law and its reflection in Russian legal monuments

The article is devoted to the analysis of the influence of Mongolian law on Russian legal monuments during the XIII– XVI centuries, when Russia was under the rule of the Golden Horde. It examines how the norms of Genghis Khan’s Yasa were reflected in such documents as the Russian Truth, the Judicial Codes of 1497 and 1550, in the areas of punishment, administrative management, terminology, centralization of power and regulation of trade. The study is based on a comparative analysis of texts, archaeological data from 2020–2024 (for example, finds in Kazan and Ryazan) and statistics showing that 15–20% of norms and terms in Russian monuments are of Mongolian origin. It was found that the Mongolian influence manifested itself in tougher punishments (an increase in corporal punishment from 5 to 18 %), the introduction of censuses and tributes, the borrowing of terms (“tamga”, “yam”), the strengthening of centralization (up to 22% of norms in Judicial Records) and the development of trade rules. However, borrowings have adapted to Slavic traditions, which is confirmed by the preservation of local institutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Siberian Law Herald
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2025.2.152
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mongolian law and its reflection in Russian legal monuments

Elena Stepanova
Siberian Law Herald
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

Mongolian law and its reflection in Russian legal monuments

Elena Stepanova
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the influence of Mongolian law on Russian legal monuments during the XIII– XVI centuries, when Russia was under the rule of the Golden Horde. It examines how the norms of Genghis Khan’s Yasa were reflected in such documents as the Russian Truth, the Judicial Codes of 1497 and 1550, in the areas of punishment, administrative management, terminology, centralization of power and regulation of trade. The study is based on a comparative analysis of texts, archaeological data from 2020–2024 (for example, finds in Kazan and Ryazan) and statistics showing that 15–20% of norms and terms in Russian monuments are of Mongolian origin. It was found that the Mongolian influence manifested itself in tougher punishments (an increase in corporal punishment from 5 to 18 %), the introduction of censuses and tributes, the borrowing of terms (“tamga”, “yam”), the strengthening of centralization (up to 22% of norms in Judicial Records) and the development of trade rules. However, borrowings have adapted to Slavic traditions, which is confirmed by the preservation of local institutions.

Siberian Law HeraldVol. 2
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mongolian law and its reflection in Russian legal monuments — Elena Stepanova · Siberian Law Herald (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS