O Vôo: Graffiti, pixação and the clash between art worlds

The article explores the intersection of graffiti and pixação in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, through the controversy surrounding the murals O Vôo by Comum and Empena de Letras , created as part of the CURA arts festival. While graffiti and pixação share visual elements and a quest for visibility, they are culturally distinct: graffiti has gained artistic recognition, whereas pixação remains marginalized and often criminalized. The conflict escalated when the pixador Ralado tagged both murals, as an act of defiance against CURA’s selection process and its appropriation of street art. These acts reignited debates about legitimacy, ownership and the institutionalization of street art. Social media amplified the tension, and a near altercation between the artists underscored the deep divides between graffiti, pixação and mainstream art. In 2023, Comum repainted O Vôo and, in a symbolic reconciliation, invited Ralado to reapply his pixação, integrating it into the mural. This act transformed a moment of conflict into a statement about the coexistence of different urban art expressions. The article highlights the ongoing tensions between artistic recognition, underground culture and institutional forces, framing the events through the lens of Howard Becker’s ‘Art Worlds’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Hip Hop Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/ghhs_00108_7
Primary Topic
Public Spaces through Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O Vôo: Graffiti, pixação and the clash between art worlds

Michel Antônio Brasil Teixeira
Global Hip Hop Studies
Public Spaces through Art
article

O Vôo: Graffiti, pixação and the clash between art worlds

Michel Antônio Brasil Teixeira
article en

Abstract

The article explores the intersection of graffiti and pixação in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, through the controversy surrounding the murals O Vôo by Comum and Empena de Letras , created as part of the CURA arts festival. While graffiti and pixação share visual elements and a quest for visibility, they are culturally distinct: graffiti has gained artistic recognition, whereas pixação remains marginalized and often criminalized. The conflict escalated when the pixador Ralado tagged both murals, as an act of defiance against CURA’s selection process and its appropriation of street art. These acts reignited debates about legitimacy, ownership and the institutionalization of street art. Social media amplified the tension, and a near altercation between the artists underscored the deep divides between graffiti, pixação and mainstream art. In 2023, Comum repainted O Vôo and, in a symbolic reconciliation, invited Ralado to reapply his pixação, integrating it into the mural. This act transformed a moment of conflict into a statement about the coexistence of different urban art expressions. The article highlights the ongoing tensions between artistic recognition, underground culture and institutional forces, framing the events through the lens of Howard Becker’s ‘Art Worlds’.

Global Hip Hop StudiesVol. 6(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Public Spaces through Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.