DIFFERENCES EMERGING IN THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO WORKS BY YAQUT AL-HAMAWI

Researchers of medieval sources are aware that medieval scholars occasionally repeated the works of writers who lived before them without specifying the identity of the quoted source or author, added their own thoughts or remarks, and created new works on similar subjects. On the other hand, some authors expanded on previous works and wrote new ones under the name “zeyl” (supplement, “tail”). These types of works had as many differences as similarities. There were even differences between previous and subsequent works by any writer on similar topics. In this context, while comparing Yaqut al-Hamawi’s “Kitab Al-Mushtarik Waḍ’an Wa-Al- Muftarik Suq’an” (“A Book of Names, Common in Form and Different in Place”) with the author’s “Mu’jam al-Buldan” (“The Dictionary of Countries”), a few distinctions in information about the Caucasus and Azerbaijan appear. Probably, while writing his last work, Yaqut al-Hamawi revisited some facts, clarified, and developed the parts that raised doubts in the work. Therefore, the most recent written work of the author has been preferred in examining the data related to the region. Additionally, both the original and translated versions of the work are presented, making comparisons and enriching them with comments and notes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Reconstructing the Past Journal of Historical Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54414/ikcb6876.
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIFFERENCES EMERGING IN THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO WORKS BY YAQUT AL-HAMAWI

Nargiz Aliyeva
Reconstructing the Past Journal of Historical Studies
Islamic Studies and History
article

DIFFERENCES EMERGING IN THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO WORKS BY YAQUT AL-HAMAWI

Nargiz Aliyeva
article en

Abstract

Researchers of medieval sources are aware that medieval scholars occasionally repeated the works of writers who lived before them without specifying the identity of the quoted source or author, added their own thoughts or remarks, and created new works on similar subjects. On the other hand, some authors expanded on previous works and wrote new ones under the name “zeyl” (supplement, “tail”). These types of works had as many differences as similarities. There were even differences between previous and subsequent works by any writer on similar topics. In this context, while comparing Yaqut al-Hamawi’s “Kitab Al-Mushtarik Waḍ’an Wa-Al- Muftarik Suq’an” (“A Book of Names, Common in Form and Different in Place”) with the author’s “Mu’jam al-Buldan” (“The Dictionary of Countries”), a few distinctions in information about the Caucasus and Azerbaijan appear. Probably, while writing his last work, Yaqut al-Hamawi revisited some facts, clarified, and developed the parts that raised doubts in the work. Therefore, the most recent written work of the author has been preferred in examining the data related to the region. Additionally, both the original and translated versions of the work are presented, making comparisons and enriching them with comments and notes.

Reconstructing the Past Journal of Historical StudiesVol. 3(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DIFFERENCES EMERGING IN THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO WORKS BY YAQUT AL-HAMAWI — Nargiz Aliyeva · Reconstructing the Past Journal of Historical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS