The Extended TOPSIS Method for MAGDM with Probabilistic Hesitant Fermatean Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set

To tackle the uncertainties in language-based evaluation and the limitations of traditional methods in capturing expert preferences within complex decision-making scenarios, this study introduces an extended TOPSIS method for MAGDM with PHFFLTSs. This novel method leverages the advantages of probabilistic linguistic term sets, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, and Fermatean fuzzy sets by constructing a probabilistic hesitant Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term decision matrix. This matrix enables experts to articulate their confidence in various linguistic terms while retaining a hesitant stance towards multiple terms, offering a more nuanced and adaptable reflection of decision-making uncertainties and fuzziness. The paper details the methodological steps, encompassing the creation of a "seven-value" linguistic term set, formulation of the probabilistic hesitant Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term decision matrix, integration of multiple decision matrices, normalization, attribute weight calculation, identification of positive and negative ideal solutions, and proximity coefficient computation. These steps collectively enable a thorough evaluation and ranking of alternatives. Example analysis and comparative analysis reveal that this method surpasses the extended TOPSIS method for MAGDM with PHIFLTSs in both discrimination power and decision quality. It presents a new research avenue and theoretical framework for fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making, enriching the field’s theoretical underpinnings and providing a robust tool for addressing increasingly complex and uncertain decision challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk analysis and crisis response
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v15i2.663
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Extended TOPSIS Method for MAGDM with Probabilistic Hesitant Fermatean Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set

Mu Zhang, Mengyao Zhan
Journal of risk analysis and crisis response
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

The Extended TOPSIS Method for MAGDM with Probabilistic Hesitant Fermatean Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set

Mu Zhang, Mengyao Zhan
article en

Abstract

To tackle the uncertainties in language-based evaluation and the limitations of traditional methods in capturing expert preferences within complex decision-making scenarios, this study introduces an extended TOPSIS method for MAGDM with PHFFLTSs. This novel method leverages the advantages of probabilistic linguistic term sets, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, and Fermatean fuzzy sets by constructing a probabilistic hesitant Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term decision matrix. This matrix enables experts to articulate their confidence in various linguistic terms while retaining a hesitant stance towards multiple terms, offering a more nuanced and adaptable reflection of decision-making uncertainties and fuzziness. The paper details the methodological steps, encompassing the creation of a "seven-value" linguistic term set, formulation of the probabilistic hesitant Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term decision matrix, integration of multiple decision matrices, normalization, attribute weight calculation, identification of positive and negative ideal solutions, and proximity coefficient computation. These steps collectively enable a thorough evaluation and ranking of alternatives. Example analysis and comparative analysis reveal that this method surpasses the extended TOPSIS method for MAGDM with PHIFLTSs in both discrimination power and decision quality. It presents a new research avenue and theoretical framework for fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making, enriching the field’s theoretical underpinnings and providing a robust tool for addressing increasingly complex and uncertain decision challenges.

Journal of risk analysis and crisis responseVol. 15(2)
Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.