Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on ePROMs in Surgical Breast Cancer Follow‐Up: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Background: The growing number of breast cancer survivors underscores the need for tailored follow‐up care, particularly focussing on person‐centred outcomes in surgical follow‐ups. Electronic patient‐reported outcome measures (ePROMs) have the potential to enhance person‐centred care (PCC) by systematically integrating patient perspectives into clinical practice. However, the barriers and facilitators for the utilization of ePROMs in surgical breast cancer follow‐ups remain unclear. Methods: This study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed‐methods design. Quantitative data were collected via a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to assess their familiarity with and perspectives on ePROMs. These findings informed focussed ethnographic qualitative research, including participant observations and interviews, to explore the practical application of ePROMs in clinical practice. Data integration involved a joint display analysis to develop comprehensive insights. Results: While most HCPs (88%) expressed interest in learning more about ePROMs, only 20% agreed that ePROMs improved treatment and care. Time constraints (reported by 56%) and limited system integration (68% were unfamiliar with access via EMR) were reported as key barriers. Nurses prioritized experiential and patient‐specific approaches, often relying on intuition rather than systematic use of ePROMs, whereas surgeons viewed ePROMs as tools for improving resource allocation and surgical outcomes. Knowledge gaps and a lack of organizational support were prevalent, hindering the consistent application of ePROMs in routine care. Conclusions: ePROMs have untapped potential to transform surgical follow‐ups in breast cancer care by aligning clinical practices with person‐centred outcomes. Effective integration requires addressing technical and organizational barriers, enhancing HCPs’ competencies and fostering a supportive culture for systematic ePROM utilization. Tailored implementation strategies are a key to fully realizing the benefits of ePROMs in achieving PCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer Care
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ecc/8870031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on ePROMs in Surgical Breast Cancer Follow‐Up: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Volker-Jürgen Schmidt, Lone Jørgensen, Karin Piil, Stine Thestrup Hansen et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Cancer Care
Social Media in Health Education
2.17
article

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on ePROMs in Surgical Breast Cancer Follow‐Up: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Volker-Jürgen Schmidt, Lone Jørgensen, Karin Piil, Stine Thestrup Hansen, Lotte Gebhard Ørsted
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The growing number of breast cancer survivors underscores the need for tailored follow‐up care, particularly focussing on person‐centred outcomes in surgical follow‐ups. Electronic patient‐reported outcome measures (ePROMs) have the potential to enhance person‐centred care (PCC) by systematically integrating patient perspectives into clinical practice. However, the barriers and facilitators for the utilization of ePROMs in surgical breast cancer follow‐ups remain unclear. Methods: This study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed‐methods design. Quantitative data were collected via a survey among healthcare professionals (HCPs) to assess their familiarity with and perspectives on ePROMs. These findings informed focussed ethnographic qualitative research, including participant observations and interviews, to explore the practical application of ePROMs in clinical practice. Data integration involved a joint display analysis to develop comprehensive insights. Results: While most HCPs (88%) expressed interest in learning more about ePROMs, only 20% agreed that ePROMs improved treatment and care. Time constraints (reported by 56%) and limited system integration (68% were unfamiliar with access via EMR) were reported as key barriers. Nurses prioritized experiential and patient‐specific approaches, often relying on intuition rather than systematic use of ePROMs, whereas surgeons viewed ePROMs as tools for improving resource allocation and surgical outcomes. Knowledge gaps and a lack of organizational support were prevalent, hindering the consistent application of ePROMs in routine care. Conclusions: ePROMs have untapped potential to transform surgical follow‐ups in breast cancer care by aligning clinical practices with person‐centred outcomes. Effective integration requires addressing technical and organizational barriers, enhancing HCPs’ competencies and fostering a supportive culture for systematic ePROM utilization. Tailored implementation strategies are a key to fully realizing the benefits of ePROMs in achieving PCC.

European Journal of Cancer CareVol. 2025(1)
Roskilde University (DK), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of St.Gallen (CH), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Social Media in Health Education
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.