Study on the Evaluation of Language Courses in Kindergartens Based on AHP and Fuzzy Optimal Observation Model

This study indicatively integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) model to systematically evaluate language courses in kindergartens, addressing the subjective ambiguity and multidimensional weighting challenges inherent in early childhood education assessment. Through a rigorously validated indicator system and empirical data from 30 classrooms, results demonstrate that language courses significantly enhance vocabulary understanding (C11: 85.2) and oral fluency (C21: 89.5), yet reveal critical gaps in logical expression (C42: 62.3). The proposed model achieves 92% consistency with expert validation, offering educators a quantifiable tool for curriculum optimization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Education Forum
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26689/ief.v3i6.10977
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Evaluation of Language Courses in Kindergartens Based on AHP and Fuzzy Optimal Observation Model

Yu Miao, Jing Li
1 citations
International Education Forum
Educational Technology and Assessment
3.25
article

Study on the Evaluation of Language Courses in Kindergartens Based on AHP and Fuzzy Optimal Observation Model

Yu Miao, Jing Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study indicatively integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) model to systematically evaluate language courses in kindergartens, addressing the subjective ambiguity and multidimensional weighting challenges inherent in early childhood education assessment. Through a rigorously validated indicator system and empirical data from 30 classrooms, results demonstrate that language courses significantly enhance vocabulary understanding (C11: 85.2) and oral fluency (C21: 89.5), yet reveal critical gaps in logical expression (C42: 62.3). The proposed model achieves 92% consistency with expert validation, offering educators a quantifiable tool for curriculum optimization.

International Education ForumVol. 3(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Technology and Assessment
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.