What drives employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland?

This study explored employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland, using Bredgaard's typology to categorize employers into four types: committed, sceptical, passive, and dismissive. Committed employers, driven by workforce development or corporate social responsibility, actively engaged with apprenticeships but their primary purpose often determined how these were managed and experienced. Sceptical employers, motivated by industry norms, financial incentives, or short-term recruitment needs, exhibited inconsistent engagement and were prone to practices like rebadging or substitution. Passive employers often lacked understanding of apprenticeship frameworks and feared value misalignment, leading to non-engagement. Dismissive employers prioritized flexible labor practices and cost reduction, viewing apprenticeships as incompatible with broader operational strategy. By advancing theoretical and practical insights, this work contributes to efforts to enhance the quantity and quality of apprenticeship opportunities in Scotland. It underscores the need for tailored strategies to address the diverse factors impacting employer engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vocation Technology & Education
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54844/vte.2025.0942
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland?

Paul Quigley
Vocation Technology & Education
Education Systems and Policy
article

What drives employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland?

Paul Quigley
article en

Abstract

This study explored employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland, using Bredgaard's typology to categorize employers into four types: committed, sceptical, passive, and dismissive. Committed employers, driven by workforce development or corporate social responsibility, actively engaged with apprenticeships but their primary purpose often determined how these were managed and experienced. Sceptical employers, motivated by industry norms, financial incentives, or short-term recruitment needs, exhibited inconsistent engagement and were prone to practices like rebadging or substitution. Passive employers often lacked understanding of apprenticeship frameworks and feared value misalignment, leading to non-engagement. Dismissive employers prioritized flexible labor practices and cost reduction, viewing apprenticeships as incompatible with broader operational strategy. By advancing theoretical and practical insights, this work contributes to efforts to enhance the quantity and quality of apprenticeship opportunities in Scotland. It underscores the need for tailored strategies to address the diverse factors impacting employer engagement.

Vocation Technology & Education
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What drives employer engagement with apprenticeships in Scotland? — Paul Quigley · Vocation Technology & Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS