The Rise and Fall and Rise of Pronatalism: A Disingenuous Policy that Harms the Health of People and Society

Pronatalist policies are on the rise in many countries. These have stemmed from several motivators, including economic concerns, nationalism, and promotion of traditional family values. As global fertility rates have fallen, many countries have instilled pronatalist policies to encourage people to have more children. In other countries, including the United States, religious traditionalism and nationalist forces have fueled pronatalist policies as a counter to improved female empowerment and global immigration. No matter the stated motivation, government-sanctioned pronatalism overtly leads to reproductive coercion or covertly results in limited reproductive autonomy as collateral damage. Herein, we review global examples of prior and current pronatalist policies, outlining the motivators for their promotion within each case. We demonstrate how these policies are not only ineffective, but are dangerous to the health and well-being of women and other populations and are in direct conflict with modern reproductive goals, reproductive justice, and decades of efforts towards achieving gender parity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10129
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise and Fall and Rise of Pronatalism: A Disingenuous Policy that Harms the Health of People and Society

Deborah Bartz, Rasadokht Forati
7 citations
The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Family Dynamics and Relationships
39.14
article

The Rise and Fall and Rise of Pronatalism: A Disingenuous Policy that Harms the Health of People and Society

Deborah Bartz, Rasadokht Forati
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Pronatalist policies are on the rise in many countries. These have stemmed from several motivators, including economic concerns, nationalism, and promotion of traditional family values. As global fertility rates have fallen, many countries have instilled pronatalist policies to encourage people to have more children. In other countries, including the United States, religious traditionalism and nationalist forces have fueled pronatalist policies as a counter to improved female empowerment and global immigration. No matter the stated motivation, government-sanctioned pronatalism overtly leads to reproductive coercion or covertly results in limited reproductive autonomy as collateral damage. Herein, we review global examples of prior and current pronatalist policies, outlining the motivators for their promotion within each case. We demonstrate how these policies are not only ineffective, but are dangerous to the health and well-being of women and other populations and are in direct conflict with modern reproductive goals, reproductive justice, and decades of efforts towards achieving gender parity.

The Journal of Law Medicine & EthicsVol. 53(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Yale University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
39.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.