CCS MMV may Learn from an UGS Case Implementing Trinity Integrity Risk Management

Summary There are many similarities between CCS and UGS, and MMV is a critical risk management step for these gas storage facilities. The integrity management of UGS and CCS requires functional and physical integrity of geological body, wellbore, and surface facilities during the whole life cycle of storage facilities. Based on the operational practice of an UGS case, which is online for 11 years and was converted from a depleted gas reservoir, the “geological body-wellbore-surface facility” trinity integrity risk management model is established. For the gas reservoir management, a dynamic monitoring system of “conventional monitoring + optical fiber monitoring + micro seismic monitoring + 4D geomechanical dynamic monitoring” is established. These ensure a safe, stable, under control and efficient operation. In this paper, we will show this UGS case which has implemented Trinity Integrity Risk Management (TIRM) and dynamic 4D monitoring system for the whole life cycle of UGS operation, whose concept and practice may be a good demonstration for CCS MMV utilizing depleted reservoir to storage CO2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202573062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CCS MMV may Learn from an UGS Case Implementing Trinity Integrity Risk Management

Y. Wang, Jiang Hua, Xiaoying Ma, Haiyang Yu et al.
1 citations
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
article

CCS MMV may Learn from an UGS Case Implementing Trinity Integrity Risk Management

Y. Wang, Jiang Hua, Xiaoying Ma, Haiyang Yu, Lin Li, Yaping Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Summary There are many similarities between CCS and UGS, and MMV is a critical risk management step for these gas storage facilities. The integrity management of UGS and CCS requires functional and physical integrity of geological body, wellbore, and surface facilities during the whole life cycle of storage facilities. Based on the operational practice of an UGS case, which is online for 11 years and was converted from a depleted gas reservoir, the “geological body-wellbore-surface facility” trinity integrity risk management model is established. For the gas reservoir management, a dynamic monitoring system of “conventional monitoring + optical fiber monitoring + micro seismic monitoring + 4D geomechanical dynamic monitoring” is established. These ensure a safe, stable, under control and efficient operation. In this paper, we will show this UGS case which has implemented Trinity Integrity Risk Management (TIRM) and dynamic 4D monitoring system for the whole life cycle of UGS operation, whose concept and practice may be a good demonstration for CCS MMV utilizing depleted reservoir to storage CO2.

Petro-Canada (CA), Baker Hughes (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CCS MMV may Learn from an UGS Case Implementing Trinity Integrity Risk Management — Y. Wang, Jiang Hua, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS