Geomechanical Risk Assessment of Injectivity Test for a Carbon Storage Aquifer Reservoir

Summary A geomechanical study has been conducted to assess the risk of formation fracturing and sanding during a water injection test. Considering the temperature difference between the storage formation and the injection fluid, the cooling effects could lead to a reduction of almost 15% in fracture initiation pressure (FIP). Notably, the FIP for perforations aligned with the maximum horizontal stress direction are lower than the minimum horizontal stress. While injection pressures surpassing FIP might trigger tensile fracturing in specific perforations, fracture propagation from the wellbore remains unlikely if the injection pressure remains below the field’s minimum horizontal stress. The pressure requirements for current envisaged matrix injection rates fall below the estimated FIPs. Consequently, the risk of formation fracturing during the injection test is deemed low. The propensity of sanding during flowback, considering a range of rock weakening and thermal effects of water injection, is also found to be low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202573047
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geomechanical Risk Assessment of Injectivity Test for a Carbon Storage Aquifer Reservoir

Sadegh Asadi, Abbas Khaksar, Avirup Chatterjee
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Geomechanical Risk Assessment of Injectivity Test for a Carbon Storage Aquifer Reservoir

Sadegh Asadi, Abbas Khaksar, Avirup Chatterjee
article en

Abstract

Summary A geomechanical study has been conducted to assess the risk of formation fracturing and sanding during a water injection test. Considering the temperature difference between the storage formation and the injection fluid, the cooling effects could lead to a reduction of almost 15% in fracture initiation pressure (FIP). Notably, the FIP for perforations aligned with the maximum horizontal stress direction are lower than the minimum horizontal stress. While injection pressures surpassing FIP might trigger tensile fracturing in specific perforations, fracture propagation from the wellbore remains unlikely if the injection pressure remains below the field’s minimum horizontal stress. The pressure requirements for current envisaged matrix injection rates fall below the estimated FIPs. Consequently, the risk of formation fracturing during the injection test is deemed low. The propensity of sanding during flowback, considering a range of rock weakening and thermal effects of water injection, is also found to be low.

Baker Hughes (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geomechanical Risk Assessment of Injectivity Test for a Carbon Storage Aquifer Reservoir — Sadegh Asadi, Abbas Khaksar, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS