Balancing the (uncertainty) budget—postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: <i>Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology</i>

In postmortem forensic toxicology, the accuracy and reliability of toxicological results are critical to the medicolegal death investigation process. ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology establishes the minimum requirements for evaluating measurement uncertainty (MU) in quantitative methods utilized in forensic toxicology. Accurate evaluation of MU increases confidence in results, supports scientific rigor, enables inter-laboratory comparability, and ensures legal defensibility. Using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 8-step procedure described in ANSI/ASB Standard 056, postmortem forensic toxicology laboratories can develop customized, flexible MU budget templates that accommodate a variety of analytical workflows and sample preparation techniques commonly used in the field. This manuscript highlights the use of a template that is adaptable to both routine quantitative workflows and those employing method of standard addition, providing example MU calculations for each. By aligning laboratory practices with the NIST 8-step procedure, as well as integrating accreditation requirements and published ANSI/ASB Standards into their quality management system, laboratories enhance the accuracy and reliability of their toxicological results. Adhering to ANSI/ASB Standard 056 ensures that the inherent variability in postmortem toxicological analyses is appropriately assessed and managed in a manner consistent with best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf068
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing the (uncertainty) budget—postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology

Joseph H Kahl, Diane M Moore
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Balancing the (uncertainty) budget—postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology

Joseph H Kahl, Diane M Moore
article en

Abstract

In postmortem forensic toxicology, the accuracy and reliability of toxicological results are critical to the medicolegal death investigation process. ANSI/ASB Standard 056: Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology establishes the minimum requirements for evaluating measurement uncertainty (MU) in quantitative methods utilized in forensic toxicology. Accurate evaluation of MU increases confidence in results, supports scientific rigor, enables inter-laboratory comparability, and ensures legal defensibility. Using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 8-step procedure described in ANSI/ASB Standard 056, postmortem forensic toxicology laboratories can develop customized, flexible MU budget templates that accommodate a variety of analytical workflows and sample preparation techniques commonly used in the field. This manuscript highlights the use of a template that is adaptable to both routine quantitative workflows and those employing method of standard addition, providing example MU calculations for each. By aligning laboratory practices with the NIST 8-step procedure, as well as integrating accreditation requirements and published ANSI/ASB Standards into their quality management system, laboratories enhance the accuracy and reliability of their toxicological results. Adhering to ANSI/ASB Standard 056 ensures that the inherent variability in postmortem toxicological analyses is appropriately assessed and managed in a manner consistent with best practices.

Journal of Analytical ToxicologyVol. 49(9)
Dade County Medical Examiner Department (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing the (uncertainty) budget—postmortem toxicology laboratory conformance to ANSI/ASB Standard 056: <i>Standard for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology</i> — Joseph H Kahl, Diane M Moore · Journal of Analytical Toxicology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS