Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well‐Being Outcomes

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in‐person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) and well‐being in homebound populations. Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta‐analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta‐analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants. Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well‐being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in‐person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well‐being for homebound people. These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Social Care in the Community
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/hsc/7224151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well‐Being Outcomes

Regina Allande‐Cussó, Sonia Hines, Norma B. Bulamu, Lemma N Bulto et al.
1 citations
Health & Social Care in the Community
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
article

Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well‐Being Outcomes

Regina Allande‐Cussó, Sonia Hines, Norma B. Bulamu, Lemma N Bulto, Aarti Gulyani, Tania Marin, Jeroen Hendriks, Belinda Lange, Shelda Sajeev, Alline Beleigoli, Lemlem G. Gebremichael, Hila Ariela Dafny, Vincent Pearson, Stephanie Champion, Shannon Brown, Penelope McMillan, Katie Nesbitt, Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza, Alison Kitson, Matthew Tieu, Robyn A. Clark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in‐person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) and well‐being in homebound populations. Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta‐analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta‐analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants. Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well‐being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in‐person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well‐being for homebound people. These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Health & Social Care in the CommunityVol. 2025(1)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Flinders University (AU), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Carnegie Mellon University Australia (AU), Department of Health (TW), Centre for Remote Health (AU), Services Australia (AU), Torrens University Australia (AU), Department of Health Services (NP), The University of Adelaide (AU), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Flinders University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.