Goal‐Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients With Treatment Limitations on <scp>POLST</scp> : A Mixed‐Methods Study

This mixed-methods study of seriously ill patients with treatment limitations on POLST provides context for receipt of "POLST-discordant care" in the acute-care setting and reveals how such treatment may still represent goal-concordant care. Our findings reveal complexities when considering goal-concordant but potentially non-beneficial care among seriously ill patients, and demonstrate the impact of clinicians' mindsets and communication on delivery of high-intensity treatment. Finally, our study highlights the nuances of medical decision-making and the persistent challenge of interpreting advance-care planning documents in acute-care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goal‐Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients With Treatment Limitations on POLST : A Mixed‐Methods Study

William E. Rosa, Christopher G. Slatore, Kelly C. Vranas, Amber Lin et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
article

Goal‐Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients With Treatment Limitations on POLST : A Mixed‐Methods Study

William E. Rosa, Christopher G. Slatore, Kelly C. Vranas, Amber Lin, Donald Richard Sullivan, Jenna L. Shenk, Bo Ram Lee, Ritika Singh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This mixed-methods study of seriously ill patients with treatment limitations on POLST provides context for receipt of "POLST-discordant care" in the acute-care setting and reveals how such treatment may still represent goal-concordant care. Our findings reveal complexities when considering goal-concordant but potentially non-beneficial care among seriously ill patients, and demonstrate the impact of clinicians' mindsets and communication on delivery of high-intensity treatment. Finally, our study highlights the nuances of medical decision-making and the persistent challenge of interpreting advance-care planning documents in acute-care settings.

Journal of the American Geriatrics SocietyVol. 73(10)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Portland VA Medical Center (US), Sacred Heart Medical Center (US), Oregon Dermatology & Research Center (US), Oregon Health and Science University Hospital (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US), University of Portland (US)
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, American Thoracic Society, Collins Medical Trust
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Goal‐Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients With Treatment Limitations on <scp>POLST</scp> : A Mixed‐Methods Study — William E. Rosa, Christopher G. Slatore, et al. · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS