La inteligencia artificial y el riesgo de una analogía invertida

The aim of this paper is to present the general elements that allow us to discuss the realityof Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its place in the world as a technological object. The intentionis to suggest the need to revert the Intelligence Analogy that is primarily human and artificialjust in a derivate form. To do so, first, will be made a conceptual itinerary showing some of themost important elements that’s philosophy has made known about human intelligence. In thatway, it is possible to contrast the metaphor of AI. That is, to distinguish the sense in which thewords “intelligence” and “artificial” are used in reference to machines. In raising these aspects, wewill address the distinction between mechanical and technological objects with the intention ofshowing some of the specificities of AI. Finally, the question is if, in the face of all these distinctionsgenerated by the analysis of the reality of “artificial intelligence” as a novelty that has greaterautonomy from the human, but uses all its mathematical ingenuity and communicative skills,it is necessary to propose more appropriate terms and categories to avoid the inversion of theAnthropological Analogy and to give precise contours to the marketing of these technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sophía
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n39.2025.10
Primary Topic
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La inteligencia artificial y el riesgo de una analogía invertida

Juan David Quiceno Osorio
Sophía
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
article

La inteligencia artificial y el riesgo de una analogía invertida

Juan David Quiceno Osorio
article en

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the general elements that allow us to discuss the realityof Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its place in the world as a technological object. The intentionis to suggest the need to revert the Intelligence Analogy that is primarily human and artificialjust in a derivate form. To do so, first, will be made a conceptual itinerary showing some of themost important elements that’s philosophy has made known about human intelligence. In thatway, it is possible to contrast the metaphor of AI. That is, to distinguish the sense in which thewords “intelligence” and “artificial” are used in reference to machines. In raising these aspects, wewill address the distinction between mechanical and technological objects with the intention ofshowing some of the specificities of AI. Finally, the question is if, in the face of all these distinctionsgenerated by the analysis of the reality of “artificial intelligence” as a novelty that has greaterautonomy from the human, but uses all its mathematical ingenuity and communicative skills,it is necessary to propose more appropriate terms and categories to avoid the inversion of theAnthropological Analogy and to give precise contours to the marketing of these technologies.

Sophía(39)
Universidad Católica San Pablo (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Communication and COVID-19 Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

La inteligencia artificial y el riesgo de una analogía invertida — Juan David Quiceno Osorio · Sophía (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS